PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CNDU.TO vs. UPRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CNDU.TO vs. UPRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BetaPro S&P/TSX 60 2x Daily Bull ETF (CNDU.TO) and ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CNDU.TO vs. UPRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CNDU.TO
BetaPro S&P/TSX 60 2x Daily Bull ETF
4.34%54.27%34.82%15.07%-17.75%59.15%-4.99%42.24%-19.24%15.76%
UPRO
ProShares UltraPro S&P 500
-14.90%25.83%77.62%64.82%-53.77%96.84%8.23%92.35%-18.76%60.46%
Different Trading Currencies

CNDU.TO is traded in CAD, while UPRO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the UPRO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNDU.TO achieves a 4.34% return, which is significantly higher than UPRO's -14.90% return. Over the past 10 years, CNDU.TO has underperformed UPRO with an annualized return of 18.53%, while UPRO has yielded a comparatively higher 26.08% annualized return.


CNDU.TO

1D
4.89%
1M
-6.84%
YTD
4.34%
6M
14.56%
1Y
58.23%
3Y*
32.99%
5Y*
21.85%
10Y*
18.53%

UPRO

1D
8.49%
1M
-14.04%
YTD
-14.90%
6M
-12.65%
1Y
28.09%
3Y*
38.60%
5Y*
19.06%
10Y*
26.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CNDU.TO vs. UPRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNDU.TO has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than UPRO's 0.92% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CNDU.TO vs. UPRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNDU.TO
CNDU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
CNDU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNDU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNDU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
CNDU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNDU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

UPRO
UPRO Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
UPRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UPRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
UPRO Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
UPRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
UPRO Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNDU.TO vs. UPRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro S&P/TSX 60 2x Daily Bull ETF (CNDU.TO) and ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CNDU.TOUPRODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.02

0.53

+1.49

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.47

1.07

+1.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.16

+0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

0.93

+2.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.41

3.49

+9.92

CNDU.TO vs. UPRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNDU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is higher than the UPRO Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNDU.TO and UPRO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CNDU.TOUPRODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

0.53

+1.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.40

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.51

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.67

-0.40

Correlation

The correlation between CNDU.TO and UPRO is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

CNDU.TO vs. UPRO - Dividend Comparison

CNDU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UPRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CNDU.TO
BetaPro S&P/TSX 60 2x Daily Bull ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UPRO
ProShares UltraPro S&P 500
1.04%0.84%0.93%0.74%0.52%0.06%0.11%0.41%0.63%0.00%0.12%0.34%

Drawdowns

CNDU.TO vs. UPRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNDU.TO drawdown since its inception was -78.08%, roughly equal to the maximum UPRO drawdown of -74.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNDU.TO and UPRO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CNDU.TOUPRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.08%

-76.82%

-1.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.72%

-33.38%

+12.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.60%

-63.94%

+31.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.51%

-76.82%

+15.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.17%

-20.48%

+12.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.55%

-14.53%

-9.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.55%

8.33%

-3.78%

Volatility

CNDU.TO vs. UPRO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BetaPro S&P/TSX 60 2x Daily Bull ETF (CNDU.TO) is 10.76%, while ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO) has a volatility of 15.71%. This indicates that CNDU.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UPRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CNDU.TOUPRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.76%

15.71%

-4.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.82%

28.09%

-8.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.08%

53.54%

-24.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.44%

47.67%

-22.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.07%

51.21%

-21.14%