CNDU.TO vs. ENBE.TO
CNDU.TO (BetaPro S&P/TSX 60 2x Daily Bull ETF) and ENBE.TO (Harvest Enbridge Enhanced High Income Shares ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CNDU.TO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX 60 Index, while ENBE.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Harvest. CNDU.TO is passively managed, while ENBE.TO is actively managed. Their 0.09 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CNDU.TO charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for ENBE.TO.
Performance
CNDU.TO vs. ENBE.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNDU.TO achieves a 24.33% return, which is significantly higher than ENBE.TO's 20.40% return.
CNDU.TO
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- 1.66%
- 6M
- 25.71%
- YTD
- 24.33%
- 1Y
- 65.86%
- 3Y*
- 39.29%
- 5Y*
- 22.52%
- 10Y*
- 19.01%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.93%
ENBE.TO
- 1D
- -1.28%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- 6M
- 20.42%
- YTD
- 20.40%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$1.36M | CA$1.29M | CA$1.39M | |
| CA$135.36K | CA$104.71K | CA$69.67K |
CNDU.TO vs. ENBE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CNDU.TO BetaPro S&P/TSX 60 2x Daily Bull ETF | 24.33% | 25.31% |
ENBE.TO Harvest Enbridge Enhanced High Income Shares ETF | 20.40% | -0.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNDU.TO and ENBE.TO is 0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNDU.TO vs. ENBE.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CNDU.TO
ENBE.TO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CNDU.TO vs. ENBE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro S&P/TSX 60 2x Daily Bull ETF (CNDU.TO) and Harvest Enbridge Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (ENBE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CNDU.TO | ENBE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.14 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.09 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CNDU.TO vs. ENBE.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNDU.TO drawdown since its inception was -78.04%, which is greater than ENBE.TO's maximum drawdown of -11.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNDU.TO and ENBE.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNDU.TO | ENBE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.04% | -11.28% | -66.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.52% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.87% | -5.26% | +2.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.16% | -3.14% | -20.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.49% | — | — |
Volatility
CNDU.TO vs. ENBE.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNDU.TO | ENBE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.02% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.46% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.45% | 18.34% | +6.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.63% | 18.34% | +7.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.05% | 18.34% | +11.71% |
CNDU.TO vs. ENBE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNDU.TO has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than ENBE.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
CNDU.TO vs. ENBE.TO - Dividend Comparison
CNDU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ENBE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.95%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CNDU.TO BetaPro S&P/TSX 60 2x Daily Bull ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ENBE.TO Harvest Enbridge Enhanced High Income Shares ETF | 10.95% | 4.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CNDU.TO and ENBE.TO have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ENBE.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ENBE.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for CNDU.TO.
CNDU.TO is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while ENBE.TO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Harvest. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for CNDU.TO and 0.40% for ENBE.TO.
Find the right allocation for CNDU.TO and ENBE.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer