PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ENBE.TO vs. HTAE.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ENBE.TO vs. HTAE.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Enbridge Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (ENBE.TO) and Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF - Class A Units (HTAE.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENBE.TO achieves a 27.08% return, which is significantly higher than HTAE.TO's 19.68% return.


ENBE.TO

1D
0.87%
1M
2.73%
6M
26.22%
YTD
27.08%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

HTAE.TO

1D
-1.44%
1M
-3.48%
6M
18.29%
YTD
19.68%
1Y
28.50%
3Y*
24.53%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
31.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$97.44KCA$77.42KCA$75.28K
CA$206.20KCA$268.76KCA$375.85K

ENBE.TO vs. HTAE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ENBE.TO and HTAE.TO is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025

-0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ENBE.TO vs. HTAE.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENBE.TO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


HTAE.TO
HTAE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
HTAE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTAE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTAE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
HTAE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTAE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENBE.TO vs. HTAE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Enbridge Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (ENBE.TO) and Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF - Class A Units (HTAE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ENBE.TOHTAE.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.66

ENBE.TO vs. HTAE.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ENBE.TO vs. HTAE.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENBE.TO drawdown since its inception was -11.28%, smaller than the maximum HTAE.TO drawdown of -30.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENBE.TO and HTAE.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ENBE.TOHTAE.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.28%

-30.83%

+19.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-10.70%

+10.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.12%

-4.64%

+1.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.13%

Volatility

ENBE.TO vs. HTAE.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ENBE.TOHTAE.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.24%

27.36%

-9.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.24%

27.89%

-9.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.24%

27.89%

-9.65%

ENBE.TO vs. HTAE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ENBE.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than HTAE.TO's 2.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

ENBE.TO vs. HTAE.TO - Dividend Comparison

ENBE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.34%, less than HTAE.TO's 10.49% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
ENBE.TO
Harvest Enbridge Enhanced High Income Shares ETF
9.34%4.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HTAE.TO
Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF - Class A Units
10.49%11.28%10.01%9.40%2.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


ENBE.TO and HTAE.TO have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ENBE.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ENBE.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 2.49% for HTAE.TO.

ENBE.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while HTAE.TO is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for ENBE.TO and 2.49% for HTAE.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ENBE.TO and HTAE.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer