CNCR vs. CANC
CNCR (Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF) and CANC (Tema Oncology ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. CNCR is passively managed, while CANC is actively managed. CNCR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CANC.
Performance
CNCR vs. CANC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CNCR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CANC
- 1D
- 1.64%
- 1M
- 1.56%
- YTD
- 11.49%
- 6M
- 9.19%
- 1Y
- 56.88%
- 3Y*
- 132.65%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CNCR vs. CANC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CNCR Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF | 0.00% |
CANC Tema Oncology ETF | 8.83% |
CNCR vs. CANC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CNCR
CANC
Healthcare
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
CNCR
CANC
Financial Services
CNCR
CANC
-
Basic Materials
CNCR
-
CANC
-
Communication Services
CNCR
-
CANC
-
Consumer Cyclical
CNCR
-
CANC
-
Consumer Defensive
CNCR
-
CANC
-
Energy
CNCR
-
CANC
-
Industrials
CNCR
-
CANC
-
Real Estate
CNCR
-
CANC
-
Technology
CNCR
-
CANC
-
Utilities
CNCR
-
CANC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNCR vs. CANC — Risk / Return Rank
CNCR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CANC
CNCR vs. CANC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR) and Tema Oncology ETF (CANC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CNCR | CANC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.40 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 6.15 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 16.71 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CNCR vs. CANC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNCR drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum CANC drawdown of -97.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNCR and CANC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNCR | CANC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -97.53% | +97.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -30.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -53.78% | +53.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -72.94% | +72.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.41% | — |
Volatility
CNCR vs. CANC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNCR | CANC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.60% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.94% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 22.72% | -22.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 278.65% | -278.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 278.65% | -278.65% |
CNCR vs. CANC - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNCR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than CANC's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CNCR vs. CANC - Dividend Comparison
CNCR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CANC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CANC Tema Oncology ETF | 0.05% | 0.06% | 3.00% | 0.56% |
CNCR Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, CANC is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CANC is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for CNCR.
CANC has the higher dividend yield at 0.05%, compared with 0.00% for CNCR.
They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Tema. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for CNCR and 0.75% for CANC.
Find the right allocation for CNCR and CANC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer