CNBS vs. BATT
Compare and contrast key facts about Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS) and Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT).
CNBS and BATT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CNBS is an actively managed fund by Amplify. It was launched on Jul 23, 2019. BATT is an actively managed fund by Amplify. It was launched on Jun 6, 2018.
Performance
CNBS vs. BATT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CNBS vs. BATT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNBS Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF | -19.71% | 15.33% | -29.41% | -16.11% | -63.98% | -19.02% | 31.94% | -44.97% |
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF | 8.99% | 59.70% | -13.93% | -7.05% | -32.25% | 16.52% | 44.43% | -2.33% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNBS achieves a -19.71% return, which is significantly lower than BATT's 8.99% return.
CNBS
- 1D
- 3.35%
- 1M
- 1.68%
- YTD
- -19.71%
- 6M
- -25.83%
- 1Y
- 34.54%
- 3Y*
- -12.81%
- 5Y*
- -37.62%
- 10Y*
- —
BATT
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- -7.16%
- YTD
- 8.99%
- 6M
- 16.65%
- 1Y
- 82.30%
- 3Y*
- 8.21%
- 5Y*
- 2.14%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CNBS vs. BATT - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNBS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BATT's 0.59% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CNBS vs. BATT — Risk / Return Rank
CNBS
BATT
CNBS vs. BATT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS) and Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CNBS | BATT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.34 | 2.56 | -2.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.39 | 2.99 | -1.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.41 | -0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.68 | 4.64 | -3.96 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.34 | 17.14 | -15.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CNBS | BATT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 | 2.56 | -2.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.60 | 0.07 | -0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.46 | -0.05 | -0.41 |
Correlation
The correlation between CNBS and BATT is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CNBS vs. BATT - Dividend Comparison
CNBS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BATT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNBS Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 43.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.58% | 0.58% | 0.00% |
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF | 1.70% | 1.85% | 3.17% | 3.23% | 4.14% | 2.32% | 0.21% | 3.22% | 0.89% |
Drawdowns
CNBS vs. BATT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNBS drawdown since its inception was -95.71%, which is greater than BATT's maximum drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNBS and BATT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNBS | BATT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.71% | -69.38% | -26.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.25% | -17.58% | -33.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.21% | -61.98% | -32.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.00% | -15.47% | -77.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -70.74% | -35.40% | -35.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.95% | 4.87% | +21.08% |
Volatility
CNBS vs. BATT - Volatility Comparison
Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS) has a higher volatility of 22.14% compared to Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) at 12.38%. This indicates that CNBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BATT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CNBS | BATT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.14% | 12.38% | +9.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 75.61% | 25.10% | +50.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 101.71% | 32.28% | +69.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.86% | 29.24% | +33.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.38% | 30.55% | +29.83% |