CNAA.DE vs. CHIN.DE
CNAA.DE (Amundi MSCI China A UCITS ETF Acc) and CHIN.DE (KraneShares ICBCCS S&P China 500 Index UCITS ETF USD) are both China Equities funds - CNAA.DE tracks the MSCI China A while CHIN.DE tracks the S&P China 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CNAA.DE returned 33.60% vs 26.49% for CHIN.DE. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CNAA.DE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for CHIN.DE.
Performance
CNAA.DE vs. CHIN.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNAA.DE achieves a 9.91% return, which is significantly higher than CHIN.DE's 6.22% return.
CNAA.DE
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 9.91%
- 6M
- 11.19%
- 1Y
- 33.60%
- 3Y*
- 8.43%
- 5Y*
- -0.21%
- 10Y*
- —
CHIN.DE
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- -0.17%
- YTD
- 6.22%
- 6M
- 6.27%
- 1Y
- 26.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CNAA.DE vs. CHIN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CNAA.DE Amundi MSCI China A UCITS ETF Acc | 9.91% | 10.09% | 19.81% | -6.21% |
CHIN.DE KraneShares ICBCCS S&P China 500 Index UCITS ETF USD | 6.22% | 16.60% | 23.10% | -6.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNAA.DE and CHIN.DE is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2023 | 0.88 |
The correlation between CNAA.DE and CHIN.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNAA.DE vs. CHIN.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CNAA.DE
CHIN.DE
CNAA.DE vs. CHIN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI China A UCITS ETF Acc (CNAA.DE) and KraneShares ICBCCS S&P China 500 Index UCITS ETF USD (CHIN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CNAA.DE | CHIN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.28 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.08 | 3.02 | +2.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.52 | 8.15 | +5.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CNAA.DE | CHIN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.04 | 1.57 | +0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.64 | -0.35 |
Drawdowns
CNAA.DE vs. CHIN.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNAA.DE drawdown since its inception was -43.90%, which is greater than CHIN.DE's maximum drawdown of -22.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNAA.DE and CHIN.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNAA.DE | CHIN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.90% | -22.95% | -20.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.65% | -8.84% | +2.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.33% | -3.48% | -7.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.23% | -7.69% | -11.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.50% | 3.29% | -0.79% |
Volatility
CNAA.DE vs. CHIN.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI China A UCITS ETF Acc (CNAA.DE) and KraneShares ICBCCS S&P China 500 Index UCITS ETF USD (CHIN.DE) have volatilities of 6.13% and 6.18%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNAA.DE | CHIN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.13% | 6.18% | -0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.38% | 12.00% | -0.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.52% | 17.09% | -0.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.44% | 22.41% | -0.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.51% | 22.41% | +0.10% |
CNAA.DE vs. CHIN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNAA.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than CHIN.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
CNAA.DE vs. CHIN.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CNAA.DE nor CHIN.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CNAA.DE and CHIN.DE have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CNAA.DE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CNAA.DE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for CHIN.DE.
CNAA.DE tracks MSCI China A, while CHIN.DE tracks S&P China 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CNAA.DE and 0.55% for CHIN.DE.
Find the right allocation for CNAA.DE and CHIN.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer