CNAA.DE vs. AH50.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi MSCI China A UCITS ETF Acc (CNAA.DE) and Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D (AH50.DE).
CNAA.DE and AH50.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CNAA.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A. It was launched on Aug 28, 2014. AH50.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI China NR USD. It was launched on Mar 22, 2016. Both CNAA.DE and AH50.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CNAA.DE vs. AH50.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CNAA.DE vs. AH50.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNAA.DE Amundi MSCI China A UCITS ETF Acc | 0.27% | 10.09% | 19.81% | -17.19% | -20.96% | 13.50% | 28.18% | 12.50% |
AH50.DE Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D | 2.54% | 11.41% | 26.06% | -15.94% | -16.05% | 2.97% | 14.92% | 14.03% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNAA.DE achieves a 0.27% return, which is significantly lower than AH50.DE's 2.54% return.
CNAA.DE
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- -1.78%
- YTD
- 0.27%
- 6M
- 1.38%
- 1Y
- 16.87%
- 3Y*
- 2.00%
- 5Y*
- -1.06%
- 10Y*
- —
AH50.DE
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -1.60%
- YTD
- 2.54%
- 6M
- 2.78%
- 1Y
- 16.71%
- 3Y*
- 6.23%
- 5Y*
- -0.43%
- 10Y*
- 7.29%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CNAA.DE vs. AH50.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNAA.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than AH50.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CNAA.DE vs. AH50.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CNAA.DE
AH50.DE
CNAA.DE vs. AH50.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI China A UCITS ETF Acc (CNAA.DE) and Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D (AH50.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CNAA.DE | AH50.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.98 | 0.92 | +0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.40 | 1.28 | +0.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.18 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.11 | 2.86 | +0.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.35 | 7.97 | -0.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CNAA.DE | AH50.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | 0.92 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 | -0.02 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.31 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between CNAA.DE and AH50.DE is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CNAA.DE vs. AH50.DE - Dividend Comparison
CNAA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AH50.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNAA.DE Amundi MSCI China A UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AH50.DE Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D | 2.28% | 3.00% | 2.24% | 2.80% | 3.06% | 1.67% | 1.80% | 1.65% | 2.56% | 2.44% |
Drawdowns
CNAA.DE vs. AH50.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNAA.DE drawdown since its inception was -43.90%, roughly equal to the maximum AH50.DE drawdown of -45.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNAA.DE and AH50.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNAA.DE | AH50.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.90% | -45.20% | +1.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.14% | -8.24% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.85% | -39.25% | -2.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.11% | -14.92% | -4.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.38% | -16.92% | -2.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.82% | 2.56% | +0.26% |
Volatility
CNAA.DE vs. AH50.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI China A UCITS ETF Acc (CNAA.DE) and Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D (AH50.DE) have volatilities of 4.98% and 4.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CNAA.DE | AH50.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.98% | 4.84% | +0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.01% | 13.02% | -1.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.26% | 18.03% | -0.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.39% | 23.22% | -1.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.57% | 22.80% | -0.23% |