PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CNAA.DE vs. EXXU.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

CNAA.DE vs. EXXU.DE

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi MSCI China A UCITS ETF Acc (CNAA.DE) and iShares Dow Jones China Offshore 50 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXXU.DE).

CNAA.DE and EXXU.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CNAA.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A. It was launched on Aug 28, 2014. EXXU.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones China Offshore 50. It was launched on Mar 27, 2006. Both CNAA.DE and EXXU.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

CNAA.DE vs. EXXU.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI China A UCITS ETF Acc (CNAA.DE) and iShares Dow Jones China Offshore 50 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXXU.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CNAA.DE vs. EXXU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CNAA.DE
Amundi MSCI China A UCITS ETF Acc		0.27%10.09%19.81%-17.19%-20.96%13.50%28.18%12.50%
EXXU.DE
iShares Dow Jones China Offshore 50 UCITS ETF (DE)		-6.56%12.86%26.45%-11.75%-14.54%-22.68%15.85%18.09%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNAA.DE achieves a 0.27% return, which is significantly higher than EXXU.DE's -6.56% return.

CNAA.DE

1D
-0.55%
1M
-1.78%
YTD
0.27%
6M
1.38%
1Y
16.87%
3Y*
2.00%
5Y*
-1.06%
10Y*
—

EXXU.DE

1D
-0.59%
1M
0.99%
YTD
-6.56%
6M
-15.52%
1Y
-6.84%
3Y*
4.94%
5Y*
-6.02%
10Y*
3.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Amundi MSCI China A UCITS ETF Acc

iShares Dow Jones China Offshore 50 UCITS ETF (DE)

Often compared with CNAA.DE:
CNAA.DE vs. ICHN.ASCNAA.DE vs. LCHI.DECNAA.DE vs. AH50.DECNAA.DE vs. C024.DECNAA.DE vs. CEBG.DECNAA.DE vs. 36BZ.DECNAA.DE vs. 18MK.DE
Often compared with EXXU.DE:
EXXU.DE vs. 36BZ.DEEXXU.DE vs. ICGA.DEEXXU.DE vs. H4ZP.DEEXXU.DE vs. IQQC.DEEXXU.DE vs. CXSEEXXU.DE vs. VXUSEXXU.DE vs. VEA

CNAA.DE vs. EXXU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNAA.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than EXXU.DE's 0.61% expense ratio.

EXXU.DE
iShares Dow Jones China Offshore 50 UCITS ETF (DE)
CNAA.DE
Amundi MSCI China A UCITS ETF Acc

Return for Risk

CNAA.DE vs. EXXU.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CNAA.DE
CNAA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
CNAA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNAA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNAA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
CNAA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNAA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
EXXU.DE
EXXU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
EXXU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXXU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXXU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
EXXU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXXU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNAA.DE vs. EXXU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI China A UCITS ETF Acc (CNAA.DE) and iShares Dow Jones China Offshore 50 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXXU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

CNAA.DEEXXU.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.98

-0.30

+1.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.40

-0.26

+1.66

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

0.97

+0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.11

-0.41

+3.52

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.35

-0.90

+8.25

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CNAA.DE vs. EXXU.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNAA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is higher than the EXXU.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNAA.DE and EXXU.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

CNAA.DEEXXU.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

-0.30

+1.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

-0.19

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.15

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.19

+0.04

Correlation

The correlation between CNAA.DE and EXXU.DE is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CNAA.DE vs. EXXU.DE - Dividend Comparison

CNAA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EXXU.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CNAA.DE
Amundi MSCI China A UCITS ETF Acc		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EXXU.DE
iShares Dow Jones China Offshore 50 UCITS ETF (DE)		4.60%4.28%1.95%2.92%2.04%0.96%1.32%1.66%2.07%2.12%4.23%2.75%

Drawdowns

CNAA.DE vs. EXXU.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNAA.DE drawdown since its inception was -43.90%, smaller than the maximum EXXU.DE drawdown of -66.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNAA.DE and EXXU.DE.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

CNAA.DEEXXU.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.90%

-66.04%

+22.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.14%

-16.74%

+8.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.85%

-51.40%

+9.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-58.37%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.11%

-37.21%

+18.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.38%

-26.52%

+7.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

7.59%

-4.77%

Volatility

CNAA.DE vs. EXXU.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi MSCI China A UCITS ETF Acc (CNAA.DE) is 4.98%, while iShares Dow Jones China Offshore 50 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXXU.DE) has a volatility of 6.09%. This indicates that CNAA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EXXU.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

CNAA.DEEXXU.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.98%

6.09%

-1.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.01%

14.01%

-2.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.26%

23.15%

-5.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.39%

31.10%

-9.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.57%

27.26%

-4.69%