CN vs. AFTY

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN) and Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY).

CN and AFTY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CN is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the MSCI China All Shares. It was launched on Apr 30, 2014. AFTY is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the FTSE China A 50. It was launched on Mar 12, 2015. Both CN and AFTY are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

CN vs. AFTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN) and Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CN vs. AFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2024 (YTD)	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF	-3.10%	-11.87%	-23.85%	-12.74%	31.55%	26.79%	-22.41%	43.69%	-5.78%	0.82%
AFTY Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF	20.48%	-12.80%	-22.47%	-7.37%	33.77%	44.23%	-24.26%	45.15%	-7.94%	-5.79%

Returns By Period

CN

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AFTY

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CN vs. AFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

CN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than AFTY's 0.70% expense ratio.

AFTY

Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF

CN

Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF

Return for Risk

CN vs. AFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN) and Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Correlation

The correlation between CN and AFTY is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

CN vs. AFTY - Dividend Comparison

Neither CN nor AFTY has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF	0.00%	4.04%	1.80%	2.00%	0.78%	4.18%	2.09%	0.81%	11.41%	14.00%
AFTY Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF	0.00%	2.23%	2.08%	1.84%	1.48%	7.96%	1.85%	6.62%	1.19%	16.76%

Drawdowns

Volatility