CMUVX vs. ZTR
Compare and contrast key facts about Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 75/25 Fund (CMUVX) and Virtus Total Return Fund (ZTR).
CMUVX is managed by Catholic Responsible Investments Funds. It was launched on Dec 2, 2021. ZTR is an actively managed fund by Virtus. It was launched on Feb 24, 2005.
Performance
CMUVX vs. ZTR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CMUVX vs. ZTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMUVX Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 75/25 Fund | -1.55% | 14.69% | 13.39% | 19.07% | -17.54% | 3.47% |
ZTR Virtus Total Return Fund | 9.76% | 18.63% | 18.31% | -3.21% | -21.32% | 3.23% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMUVX achieves a -1.55% return, which is significantly lower than ZTR's 9.76% return.
CMUVX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -3.37%
- YTD
- -1.55%
- 6M
- -0.27%
- 1Y
- 17.97%
- 3Y*
- 12.70%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZTR
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -2.44%
- YTD
- 9.76%
- 6M
- 8.06%
- 1Y
- 24.87%
- 3Y*
- 13.98%
- 5Y*
- 5.59%
- 10Y*
- 6.77%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CMUVX vs. ZTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMUVX has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than ZTR's 3.77% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CMUVX vs. ZTR — Risk / Return Rank
CMUVX
ZTR
CMUVX vs. ZTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 75/25 Fund (CMUVX) and Virtus Total Return Fund (ZTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CMUVX | ZTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.02 | 1.61 | -0.59 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.54 | 2.22 | -0.68 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.32 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.51 | 2.16 | -0.65 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.83 | 9.28 | -2.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CMUVX | ZTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | 1.61 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.31 | +0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between CMUVX and ZTR is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CMUVX vs. ZTR - Dividend Comparison
CMUVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 36.71%, more than ZTR's 8.88% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMUVX Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 75/25 Fund | 36.71% | 36.14% | 2.54% | 2.03% | 2.47% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZTR Virtus Total Return Fund | 8.88% | 9.52% | 10.24% | 15.25% | 15.88% | 10.96% | 13.72% | 11.89% | 15.18% | 13.85% | 10.58% | 9.11% |
Drawdowns
CMUVX vs. ZTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMUVX drawdown since its inception was -23.51%, smaller than the maximum ZTR drawdown of -57.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMUVX and ZTR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMUVX | ZTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.51% | -57.25% | +33.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.59% | -7.07% | -0.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -42.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.91% | -4.09% | -0.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.48% | -9.38% | +2.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.14% | 2.60% | -0.46% |
Volatility
CMUVX vs. ZTR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 75/25 Fund (CMUVX) is 4.54%, while Virtus Total Return Fund (ZTR) has a volatility of 4.86%. This indicates that CMUVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CMUVX | ZTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.54% | 4.86% | -0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.62% | 8.53% | -0.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.74% | 14.92% | -1.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.23% | 16.86% | -3.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.23% | 21.57% | -8.34% |