PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMUVX vs. HEQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CMUVX vs. HEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 75/25 Fund (CMUVX) and John Hancock Diversified Income Fund (HEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMUVX achieves a 10.84% return, which is significantly lower than HEQ's 12.03% return.


CMUVX

1D
1.21%
1M
1.31%
6M
8.91%
YTD
10.84%
1Y
17.90%
3Y*
15.12%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.51%

HEQ

1D
0.09%
1M
0.35%
6M
7.72%
YTD
12.03%
1Y
20.70%
3Y*
12.97%
5Y*
6.84%
10Y*
7.26%
ALL TIME*
5.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$232.40K$274.12K$353.73K

CMUVX vs. HEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CMUVX
Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 75/25 Fund
10.84%14.69%13.39%19.07%-17.54%3.47%
HEQ
John Hancock Diversified Income Fund
12.03%15.64%11.70%-3.14%-3.08%2.05%

Correlation

The correlation between CMUVX and HEQ is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2021

0.56

The correlation between CMUVX and HEQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMUVX vs. HEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CMUVX
CMUVX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
CMUVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMUVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMUVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
CMUVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMUVX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

HEQ
HEQ Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
HEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
HEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CMUVX vs. HEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 75/25 Fund (CMUVX) and John Hancock Diversified Income Fund (HEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CMUVXHEQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.34

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

3.01

-0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.84

11.55

-1.71

CMUVX vs. HEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMUVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the HEQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMUVX and HEQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CMUVX vs. HEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMUVX drawdown since its inception was -23.51%, smaller than the maximum HEQ drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMUVX and HEQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMUVXHEQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.51%

-44.38%

+20.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.59%

-6.92%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.12%

-13.41%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.22%

+1.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.08%

-8.50%

+2.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.80%

1.80%

0.00%

Volatility

CMUVX vs. HEQ - Volatility Comparison

Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 75/25 Fund (CMUVX) and John Hancock Diversified Income Fund (HEQ) have volatilities of 3.38% and 3.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMUVXHEQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.38%

3.40%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.78%

9.80%

-1.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.69%

11.26%

-0.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.14%

16.39%

-3.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.14%

18.81%

-5.67%

CMUVX vs. HEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMUVX has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than HEQ's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CMUVX vs. HEQ - Dividend Comparison

CMUVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 32.61%, more than HEQ's 8.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMUVX
Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 75/25 Fund
32.61%36.14%2.54%2.03%2.47%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HEQ
John Hancock Diversified Income Fund
8.68%9.30%9.79%10.75%10.09%8.92%11.64%10.09%11.50%10.44%9.57%10.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


CMUVX and HEQ have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HEQ has higher volatility (3.40%) compared to CMUVX (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMUVX dropped -23.51% vs HEQ's -44.38%.

HEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMUVX and HEQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer