PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMPVX vs. TPDAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CMPVX vs. TPDAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Alpha Plus Fund (CMPVX) and Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund (TPDAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMPVX achieves a 7.80% return, which is significantly lower than TPDAX's 10.96% return.


CMPVX

1D
0.25%
1M
3.44%
YTD
7.80%
6M
8.06%
1Y
17.46%
3Y*
13.46%
5Y*
10Y*

TPDAX

1D
0.48%
1M
-0.42%
YTD
10.96%
6M
11.99%
1Y
25.38%
3Y*
15.44%
5Y*
8.65%
10Y*
7.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMPVX vs. TPDAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CMPVX
Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Alpha Plus Fund
7.80%12.97%10.59%16.55%-16.34%2.57%
TPDAX
Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund
10.96%23.97%5.29%7.71%-5.63%3.13%

Correlation

The correlation between CMPVX and TPDAX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2021

0.58

The correlation between CMPVX and TPDAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMPVX vs. TPDAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMPVX
CMPVX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
CMPVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMPVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMPVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
CMPVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMPVX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

TPDAX
TPDAX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
TPDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
TPDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMPVX vs. TPDAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Alpha Plus Fund (CMPVX) and Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund (TPDAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CMPVXTPDAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.20

2.28

-0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.15

2.92

+0.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.43

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

3.34

-0.60

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.96

11.51

+0.46

CMPVX vs. TPDAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMPVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the TPDAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMPVX and TPDAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CMPVXTPDAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20

2.28

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.60

+0.03

Drawdowns

CMPVX vs. TPDAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMPVX drawdown since its inception was -21.62%, roughly equal to the maximum TPDAX drawdown of -22.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMPVX and TPDAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMPVXTPDAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.62%

-22.29%

+0.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.52%

-7.58%

+1.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.96%

-7.58%

-3.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.53%

+3.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.84%

-4.92%

-0.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.49%

2.20%

-0.71%

Volatility

CMPVX vs. TPDAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Alpha Plus Fund (CMPVX) is 2.52%, while Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund (TPDAX) has a volatility of 2.91%. This indicates that CMPVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TPDAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMPVXTPDAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.52%

2.91%

-0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.45%

9.47%

-3.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.12%

11.17%

-3.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.93%

10.18%

+0.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.93%

9.90%

+1.03%

CMPVX vs. TPDAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMPVX has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than TPDAX's 1.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

CMPVX vs. TPDAX - Dividend Comparison

CMPVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, more than TPDAX's 0.72% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CMPVX
Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Alpha Plus Fund
4.24%4.57%3.32%2.04%1.58%0.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TPDAX
Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund
0.72%0.80%2.76%2.35%4.48%0.50%0.00%2.89%2.69%0.13%0.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


CMPVX and TPDAX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TPDAX has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to CMPVX (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMPVX dropped -21.62% vs TPDAX's -22.29%.

TPDAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMPVX and TPDAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer