CMPVX vs. CRQSX
CMPVX (Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Alpha Plus Fund) and CRQSX (Catholic Responsible Investments Equity Index Fund) are both mutual funds - CMPVX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Catholic Responsible Investments Funds, while CRQSX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Catholic Responsible Investments Funds. Over the past 3 years, CMPVX returned 13.19%/yr vs 21.03%/yr for CRQSX. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. CMPVX charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for CRQSX.
Performance
CMPVX vs. CRQSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMPVX achieves a 7.62% return, which is significantly lower than CRQSX's 9.88% return.
CMPVX
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 1.52%
- YTD
- 7.62%
- 6M
- 7.14%
- 1Y
- 16.39%
- 3Y*
- 13.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRQSX
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- 9.88%
- 6M
- 8.95%
- 1Y
- 24.09%
- 3Y*
- 21.03%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CMPVX vs. CRQSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMPVX Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Alpha Plus Fund | 7.62% | 12.97% | 10.59% | 16.55% | -11.33% |
CRQSX Catholic Responsible Investments Equity Index Fund | 9.88% | 16.83% | 24.70% | 27.55% | -11.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMPVX and CRQSX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2022 | 0.95 |
The correlation between CMPVX and CRQSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMPVX vs. CRQSX — Risk / Return Rank
CMPVX
CRQSX
CMPVX vs. CRQSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Alpha Plus Fund (CMPVX) and Catholic Responsible Investments Equity Index Fund (CRQSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CMPVX | CRQSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.37 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.63 | 2.92 | -0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.28 | 12.94 | -1.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CMPVX vs. CRQSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMPVX drawdown since its inception was -21.62%, smaller than the maximum CRQSX drawdown of -22.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMPVX and CRQSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMPVX | CRQSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.62% | -22.96% | +1.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.52% | -8.71% | +2.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.96% | -18.95% | +7.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.25% | -1.81% | +1.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.78% | -5.23% | -0.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.51% | 1.96% | -0.45% |
Volatility
CMPVX vs. CRQSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Alpha Plus Fund (CMPVX) is 3.24%, while Catholic Responsible Investments Equity Index Fund (CRQSX) has a volatility of 4.76%. This indicates that CMPVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRQSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMPVX | CRQSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.24% | 4.76% | -1.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.02% | 9.94% | -2.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.58% | 12.60% | -4.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.96% | 17.87% | -6.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.96% | 17.87% | -6.91% |
CMPVX vs. CRQSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMPVX has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than CRQSX's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CMPVX vs. CRQSX - Dividend Comparison
CMPVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, more than CRQSX's 3.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMPVX Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Alpha Plus Fund | 4.24% | 4.57% | 3.32% | 2.04% | 1.58% | 0.07% |
CRQSX Catholic Responsible Investments Equity Index Fund | 3.36% | 3.66% | 2.09% | 1.34% | 1.56% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, CMPVX and CRQSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
CRQSX has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to CMPVX (3.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMPVX dropped -21.62% vs CRQSX's -22.96%.
CRQSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CMPVX and CRQSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer