CMPR vs. LRCX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

CMPR (Cimpress plc) and LRCX (Lam Research Corporation) are both stocks. CMPR operates in Advertising Agencies (Communication Services), while LRCX operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology). Over the past 10 years, CMPR returned -0.20%/yr vs 46.72%/yr for LRCX. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CMPR vs. LRCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cimpress plc (CMPR) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMPR achieves a 46.03% return, which is significantly lower than LRCX's 95.59% return. Over the past 10 years, CMPR has underperformed LRCX with an annualized return of -0.20%, while LRCX has yielded a comparatively higher 46.72% annualized return.

CMPR

• 1D: -1.73%
• 1M: 3.72%
• YTD: 46.03%
• 6M: 38.03%
• 1Y: 122.52%
• 3Y*: 23.97%
• 5Y*: -0.37%
• 10Y*: -0.20%

LRCX

• 1D: 5.45%
• 1M: 30.26%
• YTD: 95.59%
• 6M: 112.00%
• 1Y: 308.41%
• 3Y*: 77.68%
• 5Y*: 40.87%
• 10Y*: 46.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMPR vs. LRCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CMPR Cimpress plc	46.03%	-7.15%	-10.41%	189.93%	-61.44%	-18.38%	-30.24%	21.61%	-13.73%	30.86%
LRCX Lam Research Corporation	95.59%	139.16%	-6.84%	88.63%	-40.72%	53.66%	64.18%	119.33%	-24.40%	76.21%

Correlation

The correlation between CMPR and LRCX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.28
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2005	0.33

The correlation between CMPR and LRCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap CMPR : $2.45B LRCX : $422.29B
EPS CMPR : $1.82 LRCX : $5.29
PE Ratio CMPR : 53.56 LRCX : 63.24
PEG Ratio CMPR : 1.49 LRCX : 4.79
PS Ratio CMPR : 0.67 LRCX : 19.57
Total Revenue (TTM) CMPR : $3.66B LRCX : $21.68B
Gross Profit (TTM) CMPR : $1.71B LRCX : $10.84B
EBITDA (TTM) CMPR : $382.06M LRCX : $6.10B

Return for Risk

CMPR vs. LRCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMPR

CMPR Risk / Return Rank: 92
CMPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
CMPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
CMPR Omega Ratio Rank: 88
CMPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
CMPR Martin Ratio Rank: 94

LRCX

LRCX Risk / Return Rank: 98
LRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
LRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
LRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
LRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
LRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMPR vs. LRCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cimpress plc (CMPR) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CMPR	LRCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.72	6.23	-3.51
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.47	5.00	-1.53
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.66	-0.25
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.84	15.84	-9.00
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	18.57	53.96	-35.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CMPR vs. LRCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMPR Sharpe Ratio is 2.72, which is lower than the LRCX Sharpe Ratio of 6.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMPR and LRCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CMPR	LRCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.72	6.23	-3.51
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.01	0.90	-0.90
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.00	1.05	-1.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.18	0.43	-0.25

Drawdowns

CMPR vs. LRCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMPR drawdown since its inception was -88.74%, roughly equal to the maximum LRCX drawdown of -87.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMPR and LRCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CMPR	LRCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.74%	-87.90%	-0.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.50%	-20.01%	+2.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-61.17%	-47.10%	-14.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-83.97%	-56.39%	-27.58%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-88.74%	-56.39%	-32.35%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-43.21%	0.00%	-43.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.53%	-28.19%	-5.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.45%	5.87%	+0.58%

Volatility

CMPR vs. LRCX - Volatility Comparison

Cimpress plc (CMPR) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) have volatilities of 16.36% and 16.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CMPR	LRCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.36%	16.08%	+0.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.32%	40.17%	-10.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.30%	49.86%	-4.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	53.97%	45.94%	+8.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	54.14%	44.58%	+9.56%

Dividends

CMPR vs. LRCX - Dividend Comparison

CMPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CMPR Cimpress plc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LRCX Lam Research Corporation	0.30%	0.57%	1.19%	0.95%	1.53%	0.78%	1.04%	1.54%	2.79%	1.01%	1.28%	1.36%

Financials

CMPR vs. LRCX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cimpress plc and Lam Research Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CMPR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cimpress plc reported a gross profit of 406.31M and revenue of 886.21M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.9%.

LRCX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.91B and revenue of 5.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.8%.

CMPR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cimpress plc reported an operating income of 51.98M and revenue of 886.21M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.9%.

LRCX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported an operating income of 2.05B and revenue of 5.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.0%.

CMPR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cimpress plc reported a net income of 13.84M and revenue of 886.21M, resulting in a net margin of 1.6%.

LRCX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a net income of 1.83B and revenue of 5.84B, resulting in a net margin of 31.3%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CMPR and LRCX in my portfolio?

CMPR and LRCX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CMPR or LRCX?

CMPR has higher volatility (16.36%) compared to LRCX (16.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMPR dropped -88.74% vs LRCX's -87.90%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LRCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.23 vs 2.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.