CMPR vs. META

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Cimpress plc (CMPR) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META).

Performance

CMPR vs. META - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cimpress plc (CMPR) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CMPR vs. META - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CMPR Cimpress plc	9.63%	-7.15%	-10.41%	189.93%	-61.44%	-18.38%	-30.24%	21.61%	-13.73%	30.86%
META Meta Platforms, Inc.	-13.25%	13.09%	66.05%	194.13%	-64.22%	23.13%	33.09%	56.57%	-25.71%	53.38%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CMPR : $1.85B META : $1.47T
EPS CMPR : $0.94 META : $23.51
PE Ratio CMPR : 77.99 META : 24.34
PEG Ratio CMPR : 2.17 META : 1.00
PS Ratio CMPR : 0.51 META : 7.32
Total Revenue (TTM) CMPR : $3.56B META : $200.97B
Gross Profit (TTM) CMPR : $1.68B META : $164.79B
EBITDA (TTM) CMPR : $319.75M META : $104.55B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMPR achieves a 9.63% return, which is significantly higher than META's -13.25% return. Over the past 10 years, CMPR has underperformed META with an annualized return of -2.36%, while META has yielded a comparatively higher 17.39% annualized return.

CMPR

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: -0.07%
• YTD: 9.63%
• 6M: 15.80%
• 1Y: 61.40%
• 3Y*: 18.55%
• 5Y*: -6.75%
• 10Y*: -2.36%

META

• 1D: 6.67%
• 1M: -11.66%
• YTD: -13.25%
• 6M: -21.96%
• 1Y: -0.42%
• 3Y*: 39.60%
• 5Y*: 14.06%
• 10Y*: 17.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CMPR vs. META — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMPR

CMPR Risk / Return Rank: 82
CMPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
CMPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
CMPR Omega Ratio Rank: 75
CMPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
CMPR Martin Ratio Rank: 86

META

META Risk / Return Rank: 40
META Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
META Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
META Omega Ratio Rank: 37
META Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
META Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMPR vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cimpress plc (CMPR) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CMPR	META	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	-0.01	+1.38
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.11	0.29	+1.82
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.04	+0.21
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.52	-0.01	+3.53
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.35	-0.04	+8.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CMPR vs. META - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMPR Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is higher than the META Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMPR and META, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CMPR	META	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.37	-0.01	+1.38
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.13	0.32	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.04	0.45	-0.50
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.15	0.55	-0.39

Correlation

The correlation between CMPR and META is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CMPR vs. META - Dividend Comparison

CMPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while META's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%.

	TTM	2025	2024
CMPR Cimpress plc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
META Meta Platforms, Inc.	0.37%	0.32%	0.34%

Drawdowns

CMPR vs. META - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMPR drawdown since its inception was -88.74%, which is greater than META's maximum drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMPR and META.

Drawdown Indicators

	CMPR	META	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.74%	-76.74%	-12.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.50%	-33.30%	+15.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-83.97%	-76.74%	-7.23%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-88.74%	-76.74%	-12.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-57.37%	-27.41%	-29.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.41%	-15.19%	-18.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.37%	13.13%	-5.76%

Volatility

CMPR vs. META - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cimpress plc (CMPR) is 8.30%, while Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) has a volatility of 13.64%. This indicates that CMPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CMPR	META	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.30%	13.64%	-5.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.00%	26.73%	+1.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.01%	39.91%	+5.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	53.57%	43.77%	+9.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	53.82%	38.46%	+15.36%

Financials

CMPR vs. META - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cimpress plc and Meta Platforms, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CMPR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cimpress plc reported a gross profit of 487.72M and revenue of 1.04B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.8%.

META - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a gross profit of 48.99B and revenue of 59.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.8%.

CMPR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cimpress plc reported an operating income of 88.10M and revenue of 1.04B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.5%.

META - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported an operating income of 24.75B and revenue of 59.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 41.3%.

CMPR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cimpress plc reported a net income of 49.34M and revenue of 1.04B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.

META - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a net income of 22.77B and revenue of 59.89B, resulting in a net margin of 38.0%.