CMPR vs. META

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CMPR (Cimpress plc) and META (Meta Platforms, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Communication Services sector — CMPR in Advertising Agencies, META in Internet Content & Information. Over the past 10 years, CMPR returned -0.33%/yr vs 18.15%/yr for META. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CMPR vs. META - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cimpress plc (CMPR) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMPR achieves a 44.20% return, which is significantly higher than META's -5.54% return. Over the past 10 years, CMPR has underperformed META with an annualized return of -0.33%, while META has yielded a comparatively higher 18.15% annualized return.

CMPR

• 1D: -1.25%
• 1M: 1.42%
• YTD: 44.20%
• 6M: 30.30%
• 1Y: 115.53%
• 3Y*: 23.45%
• 5Y*: -0.08%
• 10Y*: -0.33%

META

• 1D: 4.24%
• 1M: 2.06%
• YTD: -5.54%
• 6M: -2.44%
• 1Y: -6.29%
• 3Y*: 32.06%
• 5Y*: 13.70%
• 10Y*: 18.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMPR vs. META - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CMPR Cimpress plc	44.20%	-7.15%	-10.41%	189.93%	-61.44%	-18.38%	-30.24%	21.61%	-13.73%	30.86%
META Meta Platforms, Inc.	-5.54%	13.09%	66.05%	194.13%	-64.22%	23.13%	33.09%	56.57%	-25.71%	53.38%

Correlation

The correlation between CMPR and META is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.21
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2012	0.27

The correlation between CMPR and META shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.31 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap CMPR : $2.42B META : $1.60T
EPS CMPR : $1.82 META : $27.47
PE Ratio CMPR : 52.89 META : 22.68
PEG Ratio CMPR : 1.47 META : 0.93
PS Ratio CMPR : 0.66 META : 7.45
Total Revenue (TTM) CMPR : $3.66B META : $214.96B
Gross Profit (TTM) CMPR : $1.71B META : $176.14B
EBITDA (TTM) CMPR : $382.06M META : $106.31B

Return for Risk

CMPR vs. META — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMPR

CMPR Risk / Return Rank: 92
CMPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
CMPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
CMPR Omega Ratio Rank: 87
CMPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
CMPR Martin Ratio Rank: 94

META

META Risk / Return Rank: 32
META Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
META Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
META Omega Ratio Rank: 29
META Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
META Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMPR vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cimpress plc (CMPR) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CMPR	META	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.57	-0.18	+2.75
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.34	-0.01	+3.35
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.00	+0.39
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.64	-0.19	+6.83
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	17.93	-0.41	+18.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CMPR vs. META - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMPR Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is higher than the META Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMPR and META, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CMPR	META	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.57	-0.18	+2.75
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.00	0.31	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.01	0.47	-0.48
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.18	0.56	-0.38

Drawdowns

CMPR vs. META - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMPR drawdown since its inception was -88.74%, which is greater than META's maximum drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMPR and META.

Drawdown Indicators

	CMPR	META	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.74%	-76.74%	-12.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.50%	-33.30%	+15.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-61.17%	-34.15%	-27.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-83.97%	-76.74%	-7.23%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-88.74%	-76.74%	-12.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-43.93%	-20.96%	-22.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.54%	-15.25%	-18.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.47%	15.47%	-9.00%

Volatility

CMPR vs. META - Volatility Comparison

Cimpress plc (CMPR) has a higher volatility of 16.39% compared to Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) at 8.84%. This indicates that CMPR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CMPR	META	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.39%	8.84%	+7.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.30%	26.58%	+2.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.30%	35.23%	+10.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	53.97%	43.99%	+9.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	54.13%	38.64%	+15.49%

Dividends

CMPR vs. META - Dividend Comparison

CMPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while META's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CMPR Cimpress plc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
META Meta Platforms, Inc.	0.34%	0.32%	0.34%

Financials

CMPR vs. META - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cimpress plc and Meta Platforms, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CMPR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cimpress plc reported a gross profit of 406.31M and revenue of 886.21M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.9%.

META - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a gross profit of 46.09B and revenue of 56.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.9%.

CMPR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cimpress plc reported an operating income of 51.98M and revenue of 886.21M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.9%.

META - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported an operating income of 22.87B and revenue of 56.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 40.6%.

CMPR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cimpress plc reported a net income of 13.84M and revenue of 886.21M, resulting in a net margin of 1.6%.

META - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a net income of 26.77B and revenue of 56.31B, resulting in a net margin of 47.5%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CMPR and META in my portfolio?

CMPR and META have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CMPR or META?

CMPR has higher volatility (16.39%) compared to META (8.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMPR dropped -88.74% vs META's -76.74%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CMPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.