CMMVX vs. TPDAX
CMMVX (Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Beta Plus Fund) and TPDAX (Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 3 years, CMMVX returned 13.81%/yr vs 15.25%/yr for TPDAX. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CMMVX charges 0.15%/yr vs 1.37%/yr for TPDAX.
Performance
CMMVX vs. TPDAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMMVX achieves a 7.46% return, which is significantly lower than TPDAX's 10.43% return.
CMMVX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 2.57%
- YTD
- 7.46%
- 6M
- 8.03%
- 1Y
- 17.95%
- 3Y*
- 13.81%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TPDAX
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- -1.68%
- YTD
- 10.43%
- 6M
- 11.92%
- 1Y
- 24.62%
- 3Y*
- 15.25%
- 5Y*
- 8.37%
- 10Y*
- 7.13%
CMMVX vs. TPDAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMMVX Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Beta Plus Fund | 7.46% | 13.09% | 12.44% | 16.24% | -15.57% | 2.78% |
TPDAX Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund | 10.43% | 23.97% | 5.29% | 7.71% | -5.63% | 3.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMMVX and TPDAX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2021 | 0.58 |
The correlation between CMMVX and TPDAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMMVX vs. TPDAX — Risk / Return Rank
CMMVX
TPDAX
CMMVX vs. TPDAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Beta Plus Fund (CMMVX) and Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund (TPDAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CMMVX | TPDAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.29 | 2.33 | -0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.30 | 3.00 | +0.30 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.44 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.88 | 3.37 | -0.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.73 | 11.68 | +1.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CMMVX | TPDAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.29 | 2.33 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.59 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
CMMVX vs. TPDAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMMVX drawdown since its inception was -20.58%, smaller than the maximum TPDAX drawdown of -22.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMMVX and TPDAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMMVX | TPDAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.58% | -22.29% | +1.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.31% | -7.58% | +1.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.51% | -7.58% | -3.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.00% | +4.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.47% | -4.92% | -0.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.43% | 2.19% | -0.76% |
Volatility
CMMVX vs. TPDAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Beta Plus Fund (CMMVX) is 2.38%, while Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund (TPDAX) has a volatility of 2.85%. This indicates that CMMVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TPDAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMMVX | TPDAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.38% | 2.85% | -0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.27% | 9.49% | -3.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.02% | 11.19% | -3.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.69% | 10.18% | +0.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.69% | 9.90% | +0.79% |
CMMVX vs. TPDAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMMVX has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than TPDAX's 1.37% expense ratio.
Dividends
CMMVX vs. TPDAX - Dividend Comparison
CMMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, more than TPDAX's 0.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMMVX Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Beta Plus Fund | 3.43% | 3.68% | 3.00% | 2.31% | 1.76% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TPDAX Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund | 0.73% | 0.80% | 2.76% | 2.35% | 4.48% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 2.89% | 2.69% | 0.13% | 0.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CMMVX and TPDAX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TPDAX has higher volatility (2.85%) compared to CMMVX (2.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMMVX dropped -20.58% vs TPDAX's -22.29%.
TPDAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CMMVX and TPDAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer