PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMMVX vs. QDTE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CMMVX vs. QDTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Beta Plus Fund (CMMVX) and Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CMMVX vs. QDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMMVX achieves a -1.73% return, which is significantly higher than QDTE's -3.92% return.


CMMVX

1D
1.80%
1M
-3.90%
YTD
-1.73%
6M
-0.37%
1Y
11.97%
3Y*
11.16%
5Y*
10Y*

QDTE

1D
1.50%
1M
-4.27%
YTD
-3.92%
6M
0.35%
1Y
21.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CMMVX vs. QDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMMVX has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than QDTE's 0.95% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CMMVX vs. QDTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMMVX
CMMVX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
CMMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
CMMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

QDTE
QDTE Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
QDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
QDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMMVX vs. QDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Beta Plus Fund (CMMVX) and Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CMMVXQDTEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.12

1.09

+0.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.65

1.46

+0.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.22

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

1.56

-0.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.16

5.99

+1.17

CMMVX vs. QDTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMMVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is comparable to the QDTE Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMMVX and QDTE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CMMVXQDTEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.12

1.09

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.80

-0.28

Correlation

The correlation between CMMVX and QDTE is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CMMVX vs. QDTE - Dividend Comparison

CMMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, less than QDTE's 51.17% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
CMMVX
Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Beta Plus Fund
3.75%3.68%3.00%2.31%1.76%0.08%
QDTE
Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
51.17%49.49%32.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CMMVX vs. QDTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMMVX drawdown since its inception was -20.58%, smaller than the maximum QDTE drawdown of -22.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMMVX and QDTE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CMMVXQDTEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.58%

-22.86%

+2.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.06%

-14.08%

+6.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.63%

-6.92%

+2.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.66%

-3.30%

-2.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.75%

3.68%

-1.93%

Volatility

CMMVX vs. QDTE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Beta Plus Fund (CMMVX) is 3.85%, while Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) has a volatility of 5.86%. This indicates that CMMVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CMMVXQDTEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.85%

5.86%

-2.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.18%

12.11%

-5.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.16%

19.37%

-8.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.75%

18.71%

-7.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.75%

18.71%

-7.96%