CMMVX vs. QDTE

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

CMMVX (Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Beta Plus Fund) and QDTE (Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both funds - CMMVX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Catholic Responsible Investments Funds, while QDTE is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. Over the past year, CMMVX returned 17.71% vs 39.53% for QDTE. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CMMVX charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for QDTE.

Performance

CMMVX vs. QDTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Beta Plus Fund (CMMVX) and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMMVX achieves a 7.63% return, which is significantly lower than QDTE's 16.38% return.

CMMVX

• 1D: 0.89%
• 1M: 1.39%
• YTD: 7.63%
• 6M: 7.41%
• 1Y: 17.71%
• 3Y*: 13.22%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QDTE

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 3.16%
• YTD: 16.38%
• 6M: 15.88%
• 1Y: 39.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMMVX vs. QDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CMMVX Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Beta Plus Fund	7.63%	13.09%	8.52%
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	16.38%	19.32%	17.13%

Correlation

The correlation between CMMVX and QDTE is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024	0.85

The correlation between CMMVX and QDTE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CMMVX vs. QDTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMMVX

CMMVX Risk / Return Rank: 61
CMMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
CMMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
CMMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 60
CMMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
CMMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

QDTE

QDTE Risk / Return Rank: 77
QDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
QDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
QDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 76
QDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
QDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMMVX vs. QDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Beta Plus Fund (CMMVX) and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CMMVX	QDTE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.09	2.43	-0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.99	3.06	-0.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.43	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.80	3.89	-1.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.11	15.12	-3.01

CMMVX vs. QDTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMMVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the QDTE Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMMVX and QDTE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CMMVX vs. QDTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMMVX drawdown since its inception was -20.58%, smaller than the maximum QDTE drawdown of -22.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMMVX and QDTE.

Drawdown Indicators

	CMMVX	QDTE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.58%	-22.86%	+2.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.31%	-10.20%	+3.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.51%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.08%	-0.33%	+0.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.42%	-3.13%	-2.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.45%	2.62%	-1.17%

Volatility

CMMVX vs. QDTE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Beta Plus Fund (CMMVX) is 3.26%, while Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) has a volatility of 7.84%. This indicates that CMMVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CMMVX	QDTE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.26%	7.84%	-4.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.85%	12.94%	-6.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.43%	16.37%	-7.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.72%	18.88%	-8.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.72%	18.88%	-8.16%

CMMVX vs. QDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMMVX has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than QDTE's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

CMMVX vs. QDTE - Dividend Comparison

CMMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, less than QDTE's 42.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CMMVX Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Beta Plus Fund	3.42%	3.68%	3.00%	2.31%	1.76%	0.08%
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	42.80%	49.49%	32.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CMMVX and QDTE in my portfolio?

CMMVX and QDTE have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CMMVX or QDTE?

QDTE has higher volatility (7.84%) compared to CMMVX (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMMVX dropped -20.58% vs QDTE's -22.86%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.