CMGG.TO vs. CCCX-B.TO
CMGG.TO (CI Munro Global Growth Equity Fund) and CCCX-B.TO (CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF (CAD)) are both exchange-traded funds - CMGG.TO is a Global Equities fund actively managed by CI Global Asset Management, while CCCX-B.TO is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by CI Global Asset Management. Both are actively managed. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CMGG.TO charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CCCX-B.TO.
Performance
CMGG.TO vs. CCCX-B.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMGG.TO achieves a 21.24% return, which is significantly higher than CCCX-B.TO's -28.96% return.
CMGG.TO
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 10.96%
- YTD
- 21.24%
- 6M
- 21.36%
- 1Y
- 38.88%
- 3Y*
- 35.34%
- 5Y*
- 20.56%
- 10Y*
- —
CCCX-B.TO
- 1D
- -2.54%
- 1M
- -16.58%
- YTD
- -28.96%
- 6M
- -33.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CMGG.TO vs. CCCX-B.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CMGG.TO CI Munro Global Growth Equity Fund | 21.24% | 3.91% |
CCCX-B.TO CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF (CAD) | -28.96% | -27.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMGG.TO and CCCX-B.TO is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2025 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMGG.TO vs. CCCX-B.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CMGG.TO
CCCX-B.TO
CMGG.TO vs. CCCX-B.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Munro Global Growth Equity Fund (CMGG.TO) and CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF (CAD) (CCCX-B.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CMGG.TO | CCCX-B.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.85 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.77 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CMGG.TO | CCCX-B.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.14 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.98 | -1.24 | +2.22 |
Drawdowns
CMGG.TO vs. CCCX-B.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMGG.TO drawdown since its inception was -29.00%, smaller than the maximum CCCX-B.TO drawdown of -54.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMGG.TO and CCCX-B.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMGG.TO | CCCX-B.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.00% | -54.49% | +25.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.15% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -53.93% | +53.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.91% | -33.05% | +24.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.62% | — | — |
Volatility
CMGG.TO vs. CCCX-B.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMGG.TO | CCCX-B.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.68% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.94% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.53% | 47.23% | -30.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.22% | 47.23% | -29.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.49% | 47.23% | -28.74% |
CMGG.TO vs. CCCX-B.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMGG.TO has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than CCCX-B.TO's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
CMGG.TO vs. CCCX-B.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither CMGG.TO nor CCCX-B.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CMGG.TO and CCCX-B.TO have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CCCX-B.TO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CCCX-B.TO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for CMGG.TO.
CMGG.TO is categorized as Global Equities, while CCCX-B.TO is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for CMGG.TO and 0.50% for CCCX-B.TO.
Find the right allocation for CMGG.TO and CCCX-B.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer