CCCX-B.TO vs. BTCC-U.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF (CAD) (CCCX-B.TO) and Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units (BTCC-U.TO).

CCCX-B.TO and BTCC-U.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CCCX-B.TO is an actively managed fund by CI Global Asset Management. It was launched on Aug 22, 2025. BTCC-U.TO is an actively managed fund by Purpose Investments. It was launched on Nov 9, 2021.

Performance

CCCX-B.TO vs. BTCC-U.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF (CAD) (CCCX-B.TO) and Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units (BTCC-U.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CCCX-B.TO vs. BTCC-U.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CCCX-B.TO CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF (CAD)	-26.11%	-27.81%
BTCC-U.TO Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units	-21.74%	-22.79%

Different Trading Currencies

CCCX-B.TO is traded in CAD, while BTCC-U.TO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BTCC-U.TO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCCX-B.TO achieves a -26.11% return, which is significantly lower than BTCC-U.TO's -21.78% return.

CCCX-B.TO

• 1D: -1.33%
• 1M: 3.39%
• YTD: -26.11%
• 6M: -46.65%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BTCC-U.TO

• 1D: 1.24%
• 1M: 5.05%
• YTD: -21.78%
• 6M: -40.80%
• 1Y: -21.87%
• 3Y*: 32.79%
• 5Y*: 3.36%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCCX-B.TO vs. BTCC-U.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCCX-B.TO

CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF (CAD)

Return for Risk

CCCX-B.TO vs. BTCC-U.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCC-U.TO

BTCC-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5
BTCC-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
BTCC-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
BTCC-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6
BTCC-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
BTCC-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCCX-B.TO vs. BTCC-U.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF (CAD) (CCCX-B.TO) and Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units (BTCC-U.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CCCX-B.TO	BTCC-U.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.49	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.06	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-1.32	0.10	-1.42

Correlation

The correlation between CCCX-B.TO and BTCC-U.TO is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CCCX-B.TO vs. BTCC-U.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither CCCX-B.TO nor BTCC-U.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CCCX-B.TO vs. BTCC-U.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCCX-B.TO drawdown since its inception was -54.49%, smaller than the maximum BTCC-U.TO drawdown of -75.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCCX-B.TO and BTCC-U.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CCCX-B.TO	BTCC-U.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.49%	-76.91%	+22.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-49.37%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-76.91%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-52.08%	-46.42%	-5.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.87%	-33.74%	+4.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	23.17%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CCCX-B.TO	BTCC-U.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	13.06%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	36.43%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.94%	44.45%	+5.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.94%	55.05%	-5.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.94%	55.25%	-5.31%