CMG vs. VGT
CMG (Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.) is a stock, while VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Over the past 10 years, CMG returned 15.09%/yr vs 25.19%/yr for VGT. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CMG vs. VGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMG achieves a -12.89% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 24.03% return. Over the past 10 years, CMG has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 15.09%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.19% annualized return.
CMG
- 1D
- 3.14%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- -12.89%
- 6M
- -10.82%
- 1Y
- -35.85%
- 3Y*
- -7.94%
- 5Y*
- 3.35%
- 10Y*
- 15.09%
VGT
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 1.35%
- YTD
- 24.03%
- 6M
- 24.13%
- 1Y
- 50.48%
- 3Y*
- 29.84%
- 5Y*
- 20.35%
- 10Y*
- 25.19%
CMG vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMG Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. | -12.89% | -38.64% | 31.83% | 64.83% | -20.64% | 26.07% | 65.65% | 93.87% | 49.39% | -23.40% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 24.03% | 21.77% | 29.30% | 52.66% | -29.70% | 30.45% | 46.04% | 48.62% | 2.46% | 37.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMG and VGT is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2006 | 0.45 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CMG and VGT has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMG vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank
CMG
VGT
CMG vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CMG | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.36 | -0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.71 | 2.94 | -3.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.04 | 9.11 | -10.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CMG vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMG drawdown since its inception was -74.61%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMG and VGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMG | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.61% | -54.63% | -19.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.61% | -16.40% | -35.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.89% | -27.23% | -31.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.89% | -35.07% | -23.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.89% | -35.07% | -23.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.98% | -7.18% | -45.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.37% | -7.95% | -13.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.40% | 5.28% | +30.12% |
Volatility
CMG vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG) has a higher volatility of 10.80% compared to Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) at 10.00%. This indicates that CMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMG | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.80% | 10.00% | +0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.87% | 18.00% | +5.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.63% | 22.00% | +16.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.60% | 25.40% | +8.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.63% | 24.72% | +10.91% |
Dividends
CMG vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison
CMG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMG Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.33% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CMG and VGT have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CMG has higher volatility (10.80%) compared to VGT (10.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMG dropped -74.61% vs VGT's -54.63%.
VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CMG and VGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer