PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMG vs. YUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CMG vs. YUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG) and YUM! Brands, Inc. (YUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMG achieves a -20.92% return, which is significantly lower than YUM's -2.18% return. Over the past 10 years, CMG has outperformed YUM with an annualized return of 12.92%, while YUM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.48% annualized return.


CMG

1D
-4.22%
1M
-11.28%
YTD
-20.92%
6M
-14.29%
1Y
-41.29%
3Y*
-10.81%
5Y*
1.88%
10Y*
12.92%

YUM

1D
-0.63%
1M
-6.99%
YTD
-2.18%
6M
0.24%
1Y
3.30%
3Y*
4.90%
5Y*
6.28%
10Y*
11.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMG vs. YUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CMG
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
-20.92%-38.64%31.83%64.83%-20.64%26.07%65.65%93.87%49.39%-23.40%
YUM
YUM! Brands, Inc.
-2.18%14.94%4.72%3.93%-5.99%30.05%9.85%11.41%14.61%31.09%

Correlation

The correlation between CMG and YUM is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2006

0.41

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CMG:

$38.09B

YUM:

$40.90B

EPS

CMG:

$1.09

YUM:

$6.21

PE Ratio

CMG:

26.76

YUM:

23.59

PEG Ratio

CMG:

1.00

YUM:

10.64

PS Ratio

CMG:

3.20

YUM:

4.83

Total Revenue (TTM)

CMG:

$12.14B

YUM:

$8.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CMG:

$4.39B

YUM:

$3.88B

EBITDA (TTM)

CMG:

$2.30B

YUM:

$2.83B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMG vs. YUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMG
CMG Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
CMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMG Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
CMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMG Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

YUM
YUM Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
YUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
YUM Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
YUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
YUM Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMG vs. YUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG) and YUM! Brands, Inc. (YUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CMGYUMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.08

0.15

-1.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.45

0.37

-1.83

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.80

1.04

-0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.84

0.31

-1.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.21

0.78

-1.99

CMG vs. YUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMG Sharpe Ratio is -1.08, which is lower than the YUM Sharpe Ratio of 0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMG and YUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CMGYUMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.08

0.15

-1.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

0.31

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

0.51

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.48

+0.01

Drawdowns

CMG vs. YUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMG drawdown since its inception was -74.61%, which is greater than YUM's maximum drawdown of -67.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMG and YUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMGYUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.61%

-67.69%

-6.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.76%

-12.41%

-37.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.32%

-16.10%

-41.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.32%

-23.10%

-34.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.32%

-52.17%

-5.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-57.32%

-12.41%

-44.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.32%

-12.38%

-8.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

34.33%

4.87%

+29.46%

Volatility

CMG vs. YUM - Volatility Comparison

Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG) has a higher volatility of 9.64% compared to YUM! Brands, Inc. (YUM) at 6.18%. This indicates that CMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMGYUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.64%

6.18%

+3.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.88%

14.88%

+8.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.38%

21.58%

+16.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.50%

20.38%

+13.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.63%

22.72%

+12.91%

Dividends

CMG vs. YUM - Dividend Comparison

CMG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while YUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMG
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
YUM
YUM! Brands, Inc.
1.99%1.88%2.00%1.85%1.78%1.44%1.73%1.67%1.57%1.47%41.26%2.31%

Financials

CMG vs. YUM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. and YUM! Brands, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20222023202420252026
3.09B
2.06B
(CMG) Total Revenue
(YUM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CMG vs. YUM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. and YUM! Brands, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
68.4%
44.7%
Portfolio components
CMG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.11B and revenue of 3.09B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.4%.

YUM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, YUM! Brands, Inc. reported a gross profit of 920.00M and revenue of 2.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.7%.

CMG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. reported an operating income of 397.06M and revenue of 3.09B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.9%.

YUM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, YUM! Brands, Inc. reported an operating income of 644.00M and revenue of 2.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.3%.

CMG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. reported a net income of 302.82M and revenue of 3.09B, resulting in a net margin of 9.8%.

YUM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, YUM! Brands, Inc. reported a net income of 432.00M and revenue of 2.06B, resulting in a net margin of 21.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CMG and YUM have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CMG has higher volatility (9.64%) compared to YUM (6.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMG dropped -74.61% vs YUM's -67.69%.

YUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.15 vs -1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMG and YUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer