PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CM vs. COCO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CM vs. COCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) and The Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CM achieves a 32.80% return, which is significantly higher than COCO's 24.39% return.


CM

1D
0.24%
1M
2.14%
6M
30.24%
YTD
32.80%
1Y
71.34%
3Y*
46.73%
5Y*
21.43%
10Y*
18.55%
ALL TIME*
13.80%

COCO

1D
-1.51%
1M
-4.41%
6M
23.60%
YTD
24.39%
1Y
87.01%
3Y*
35.70%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
35.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$112.13M$139.31M$149.20M
$95.25M$85.05M$87.09M

CM vs. COCO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CM
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
32.80%49.02%37.83%27.23%-25.71%-2.35%
COCO
The Vita Coco Company, Inc.
24.39%43.62%43.90%85.60%23.72%-27.33%

Correlation

The correlation between CM and COCO is 0.15, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2021

0.21

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CM:

$109.85B

COCO:

$3.77B

EPS

CM:

CA$12.82

COCO:

$1.82

PE Ratio

CM:

12.96

COCO:

36.31

PEG Ratio

CM:

1.60

COCO:

0.30

PS Ratio

CM:

2.06

COCO:

5.63

PB Ratio

CM:

1.94

COCO:

9.93

Total Revenue (TTM)

CM:

CA$61.84B

COCO:

$706.02M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CM:

CA$28.74B

COCO:

$289.23M

EBITDA (TTM)

CM:

CA$13.01B

COCO:

$143.38M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CM vs. COCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CM
CM Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
CM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
CM Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
CM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CM Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

COCO
COCO Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
COCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
COCO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
COCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
COCO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CM vs. COCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) and The Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CMCOCODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.31

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.65

3.77

+2.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

26.12

9.72

+16.40

CM vs. COCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CM Sharpe Ratio is 3.62, which is higher than the COCO Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CM and COCO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CM vs. COCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CM drawdown since its inception was -71.70%, which is greater than COCO's maximum drawdown of -56.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CM and COCO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMCOCODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.70%

-56.97%

-14.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.79%

-23.23%

+12.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.35%

-38.55%

+21.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.22%

-21.52%

+19.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.59%

-16.70%

+2.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.74%

9.02%

-6.28%

Volatility

CM vs. COCO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) is 6.74%, while The Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO) has a volatility of 14.30%. This indicates that CM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMCOCODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.74%

14.30%

-7.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.61%

45.30%

-28.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.84%

55.50%

-35.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.50%

56.79%

-35.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.64%

56.79%

-34.15%

Dividends

CM vs. COCO - Dividend Comparison

CM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, while COCO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CM
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
2.54%3.17%4.21%5.88%7.77%4.08%5.06%6.47%5.48%5.28%5.93%6.71%
COCO
The Vita Coco Company, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

CM vs. COCO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce and The Vita Coco Company, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

CM vs. COCO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce and The Vita Coco Company, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

CM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce reported a gross profit of 7.36B and revenue of 15.22B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.4%.

COCO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Vita Coco Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 105.31M and revenue of 216.15M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.7%.

CM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce reported an operating income of 3.20B and revenue of 15.22B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.0%.

COCO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Vita Coco Company, Inc. reported an operating income of 63.14M and revenue of 216.15M, resulting in an operating margin of 29.2%.

CM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce reported a net income of 2.46B and revenue of 15.22B, resulting in a net margin of 16.1%.

COCO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Vita Coco Company, Inc. reported a net income of 49.45M and revenue of 216.15M, resulting in a net margin of 22.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CM and COCO have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COCO has higher volatility (14.30%) compared to CM (6.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CM dropped -71.70% vs COCO's -56.97%.

CM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.62 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CM and COCO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer