CM vs. ANAB
CM (Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce) and ANAB (AnaptysBio, Inc.) are both stocks. CM operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services), while ANAB operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past 5 years, CM returned 20.06%/yr vs 28.81%/yr for ANAB. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CM vs. ANAB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CM achieves a 24.28% return, which is significantly lower than ANAB's 77.94% return.
CM
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- -3.29%
- YTD
- 24.28%
- 6M
- 22.27%
- 1Y
- 67.98%
- 3Y*
- 43.12%
- 5Y*
- 20.06%
- 10Y*
- 17.15%
ANAB
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- -3.68%
- YTD
- 77.94%
- 6M
- 75.76%
- 1Y
- 272.31%
- 3Y*
- 66.32%
- 5Y*
- 28.81%
- 10Y*
- —
CM vs. ANAB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CM Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | 24.28% | 49.02% | 37.83% | 27.23% | -25.71% | 42.29% | 9.25% | 19.22% | -19.75% | 20.08% |
ANAB AnaptysBio, Inc. | 77.94% | 266.16% | -38.19% | -30.88% | -10.82% | 61.63% | 32.31% | -74.53% | -36.67% | 529.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between CM and ANAB is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2017 | 0.18 |
Fundamentals
CM:
$75.95B
ANAB:
$1.65B
CM:
CA$12.14
ANAB:
-$0.91
CM:
2.07
ANAB:
7.29
CM:
1.84
ANAB:
129.44
CM:
CA$61.84B
ANAB:
$232.39M
CM:
CA$28.74B
ANAB:
$245.59M
CM:
CA$13.01B
ANAB:
$52.72M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CM vs. ANAB — Risk / Return Rank
CM
ANAB
CM vs. ANAB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) and AnaptysBio, Inc. (ANAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CM | ANAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.54 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.43 | 9.62 | -3.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.18 | 22.85 | +2.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CM vs. ANAB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CM drawdown since its inception was -71.70%, smaller than the maximum ANAB drawdown of -92.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CM and ANAB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CM | ANAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.70% | -92.08% | +20.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.79% | -28.15% | +17.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.47% | -69.32% | +49.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.61% | -69.32% | +28.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.53% | -32.89% | +29.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.65% | -64.58% | +49.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.75% | 11.83% | -9.08% |
Volatility
CM vs. ANAB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) is 7.78%, while AnaptysBio, Inc. (ANAB) has a volatility of 12.25%. This indicates that CM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANAB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CM | ANAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.78% | 12.25% | -4.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.02% | 46.71% | -30.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.03% | 69.09% | -50.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.41% | 65.38% | -43.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.61% | 75.41% | -52.80% |
Dividends
CM vs. ANAB - Dividend Comparison
CM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, while ANAB has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANAB AnaptysBio, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CM Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | 2.65% | 3.17% | 4.21% | 5.88% | 7.77% | 4.08% | 5.06% | 6.47% | 5.48% | 5.28% | 5.93% | 6.71% |
Financials
CM vs. ANAB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce and AnaptysBio, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CM and ANAB have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ANAB has higher volatility (12.25%) compared to CM (7.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CM dropped -71.70% vs ANAB's -92.08%.
ANAB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.92 vs 3.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CM and ANAB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer