CLSZ vs. QQQD
CLSZ (Tradr 2X Short CLSK Daily ETF) and QQQD (Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares) are both Inverse Equities funds - CLSZ tracks the CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) while QQQD tracks the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index (-100%). Both are passively managed. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CLSZ charges 1.49%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for QQQD.
Performance
CLSZ vs. QQQD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CLSZ
- 1D
- 13.82%
- 1M
- -26.48%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQD
- 1D
- 3.96%
- 1M
- 3.12%
- YTD
- -0.26%
- 6M
- 0.95%
- 1Y
- -21.72%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLSZ vs. QQQD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CLSZ Tradr 2X Short CLSK Daily ETF | -78.94% |
QQQD Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares | -7.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLSZ and QQQD is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2026 | 0.52 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLSZ vs. QQQD — Risk / Return Rank
CLSZ
QQQD
CLSZ vs. QQQD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short CLSK Daily ETF (CLSZ) and Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CLSZ | QQQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -1.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.67 | -0.82 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
CLSZ vs. QQQD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLSZ drawdown since its inception was -87.06%, which is greater than QQQD's maximum drawdown of -49.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSZ and QQQD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLSZ | QQQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.06% | -49.47% | -37.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -25.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -81.64% | -46.07% | -35.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.24% | -30.40% | -13.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 17.84% | — |
Volatility
CLSZ vs. QQQD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLSZ | QQQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.93% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.98% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 148.64% | 20.64% | +128.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 148.64% | 26.87% | +121.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 148.64% | 26.87% | +121.77% |
CLSZ vs. QQQD - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLSZ has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQD's 0.57% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLSZ vs. QQQD - Dividend Comparison
CLSZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CLSZ Tradr 2X Short CLSK Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQD Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares | 3.96% | 4.33% | 5.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLSZ and QQQD have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QQQD is cheaper at 0.57% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQQD is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for CLSZ.
QQQD has the higher dividend yield at 3.96%, compared with 0.00% for CLSZ.
CLSZ tracks CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK), while QQQD tracks Indxx Magnificent 7 Index (-100%). They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for CLSZ and 0.57% for QQQD.
Find the right allocation for CLSZ and QQQD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer