CLSZ vs. LRCU
CLSZ (Tradr 2X Short CLSK Daily ETF) and LRCU (Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CLSZ is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK), while LRCU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tradr. CLSZ is passively managed, while LRCU is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.57, they often move in opposite directions. CLSZ charges 1.49%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for LRCU.
Performance
CLSZ vs. LRCU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CLSZ
- 1D
- 13.82%
- 1M
- -26.48%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LRCU
- 1D
- -19.12%
- 1M
- 1.16%
- YTD
- 158.50%
- 6M
- 195.76%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLSZ vs. LRCU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CLSZ Tradr 2X Short CLSK Daily ETF | -78.94% |
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF | 44.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLSZ and LRCU is -0.57, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2026 | -0.57 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLSZ vs. LRCU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short CLSK Daily ETF (CLSZ) and Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CLSZ | LRCU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.67 | 9.14 | -9.82 |
Drawdowns
CLSZ vs. LRCU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLSZ drawdown since its inception was -87.06%, which is greater than LRCU's maximum drawdown of -40.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSZ and LRCU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLSZ | LRCU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.06% | -40.09% | -46.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -81.64% | -22.82% | -58.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.24% | -9.43% | -34.81% |
Volatility
CLSZ vs. LRCU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLSZ | LRCU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 148.64% | 111.50% | +37.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 148.64% | 111.50% | +37.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 148.64% | 111.50% | +37.14% |
CLSZ vs. LRCU - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLSZ has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than LRCU's 1.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLSZ vs. LRCU - Dividend Comparison
Neither CLSZ nor LRCU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CLSZ and LRCU have a correlation of -0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LRCU is cheaper at 1.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LRCU is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for CLSZ.
CLSZ and LRCU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
CLSZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while LRCU is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for CLSZ and 1.30% for LRCU.
Find the right allocation for CLSZ and LRCU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer