CLSM vs. LCO

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

CLSM (Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF) and LCO (LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CLSM is a Tactical Allocation fund tracking the Actively Managed, while LCO is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by LOGIQ. CLSM is passively managed, while LCO is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CLSM charges 0.82%/yr vs 1.13%/yr for LCO.

Performance

CLSM vs. LCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF (CLSM) and LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF (LCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CLSM

• 1D: -0.54%
• 1M: -0.84%
• YTD: 15.97%
• 6M: 14.14%
• 1Y: 27.22%
• 3Y*: 13.11%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LCO

• 1D: -1.74%
• 1M: -4.04%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLSM vs. LCO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CLSM Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF	14.60%
LCO LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF	6.29%

Correlation

The correlation between CLSM and LCO is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2026	0.83

Return for Risk

CLSM vs. LCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLSM

CLSM Risk / Return Rank: 71
CLSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
CLSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
CLSM Omega Ratio Rank: 70
CLSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
CLSM Martin Ratio Rank: 76

LCO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLSM vs. LCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF (CLSM) and LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF (LCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CLSM	LCO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.97	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.63	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.22	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.49	—	—

Drawdowns

CLSM vs. LCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLSM drawdown since its inception was -27.77%, which is greater than LCO's maximum drawdown of -11.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSM and LCO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLSM	LCO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.77%	-11.20%	-16.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.50%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.60%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.09%	-8.12%	+4.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.33%	-4.54%	-11.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.18%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CLSM	LCO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.46%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.06%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.92%	26.04%	-12.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.70%	26.04%	-13.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.70%	26.04%	-13.34%

CLSM vs. LCO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLSM has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is lower than LCO's 1.13% expense ratio.

Dividends

CLSM vs. LCO - Dividend Comparison

CLSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, while LCO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CLSM Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF	0.77%	0.90%	2.13%	2.58%	3.17%	0.59%
LCO LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLSM and LCO in my portfolio?

CLSM and LCO have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CLSM or LCO?

On fees, CLSM is cheaper at 0.82% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CLSM or LCO?

CLSM is cheaper with a 0.82% expense ratio, compared with 1.13% for LCO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CLSM or LCO?

CLSM has the higher dividend yield at 0.77%, compared with 0.00% for LCO.

What is the main difference between CLSM and LCO?

CLSM is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while LCO is Diversified Portfolio. They also come from different issuers: Cabana and LOGIQ. Their fees differ too: 0.82% for CLSM and 1.13% for LCO.