PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLSK vs. SNDK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CLSK vs. SNDK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) and Sandisk Corporation (SNDK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLSK achieves a 70.55% return, which is significantly lower than SNDK's 738.97% return.


CLSK

1D
0.70%
1M
31.66%
YTD
70.55%
6M
45.53%
1Y
79.42%
3Y*
64.46%
5Y*
-2.76%
10Y*
-5.38%

SNDK

1D
-5.52%
1M
41.48%
YTD
738.97%
6M
851.48%
1Y
4,404.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLSK vs. SNDK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CLSK
CleanSpark, Inc.
70.55%9.41%
SNDK
Sandisk Corporation
738.97%356.50%

Correlation

The correlation between CLSK and SNDK is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2025

0.31

Fundamentals

EPS

CLSK:

-$2.24

SNDK:

$29.70

PS Ratio

CLSK:

5.22

SNDK:

22.92

Total Revenue (TTM)

CLSK:

$739.88M

SNDK:

$13.18B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CLSK:

$306.93M

SNDK:

$7.39B

EBITDA (TTM)

CLSK:

-$103.41M

SNDK:

$5.37B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLSK vs. SNDK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLSK
CLSK Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
CLSK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLSK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLSK Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
CLSK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLSK Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

SNDK
SNDK Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
SNDK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNDK Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNDK Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
SNDK Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNDK Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLSK vs. SNDK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) and Sandisk Corporation (SNDK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CLSKSNDKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-43.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

2.13

-0.93

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.23

142.75

-141.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.04

432.21

-430.16

CLSK vs. SNDK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLSK Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is lower than the SNDK Sharpe Ratio of 44.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLSK and SNDK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CLSK vs. SNDK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLSK drawdown since its inception was -98.56%, which is greater than SNDK's maximum drawdown of -47.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSK and SNDK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLSKSNDKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.56%

-47.50%

-51.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-64.74%

-31.34%

-33.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-71.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-76.36%

-5.52%

-70.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.76%

-13.68%

-56.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

39.02%

10.33%

+28.69%

Volatility

CLSK vs. SNDK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) is 22.12%, while Sandisk Corporation (SNDK) has a volatility of 27.39%. This indicates that CLSK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SNDK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLSKSNDKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.12%

27.39%

-5.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

62.59%

70.27%

-7.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

88.76%

99.85%

-11.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

100.80%

97.63%

+3.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

183.30%

97.63%

+85.67%

Dividends

CLSK vs. SNDK - Dividend Comparison

Neither CLSK nor SNDK has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

CLSK vs. SNDK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CleanSpark, Inc. and Sandisk Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
136.41M
5.95B
(CLSK) Total Revenue
(SNDK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CLSK and SNDK have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SNDK has higher volatility (27.39%) compared to CLSK (22.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLSK dropped -98.56% vs SNDK's -47.50%.

SNDK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (44.82 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLSK and SNDK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer