PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLSE vs. PXI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CLSE vs. PXI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) and Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF (PXI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLSE achieves a 25.76% return, which is significantly lower than PXI's 31.40% return.


CLSE

1D
0.35%
1M
9.28%
YTD
25.76%
6M
28.57%
1Y
50.91%
3Y*
32.39%
5Y*
10Y*

PXI

1D
0.46%
1M
-4.09%
YTD
31.40%
6M
24.82%
1Y
43.58%
3Y*
18.11%
5Y*
16.42%
10Y*
6.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLSE vs. PXI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CLSE
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
25.76%20.44%35.54%17.54%-3.04%
PXI
Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF
31.40%3.86%0.76%5.48%28.60%

Correlation

The correlation between CLSE and PXI is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2022

0.32

Over the past year, the correlation between CLSE and PXI has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.32, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

CLSE vs. PXI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CLSE
PXI

Technology

33.2%

-

Healthcare

6.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.2%

-

Communication Services

6.1%

-

Energy

2.7%
95.6%

Industrials

2.2%
0.9%

Utilities

1.7%

-

Real Estate

1.7%

-

Basic Materials

1.5%
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

0.9%

-

Financial Services

-2.5%

-

Technology

CLSE
33.2%
PXI

-

Healthcare

CLSE
6.5%
PXI

-

Consumer Cyclical

CLSE
6.2%
PXI

-

Communication Services

CLSE
6.1%
PXI

-

Energy

CLSE
2.7%
PXI
95.6%

Industrials

CLSE
2.2%
PXI
0.9%

Utilities

CLSE
1.7%
PXI

-

Real Estate

CLSE
1.7%
PXI

-

Basic Materials

CLSE
1.5%
PXI
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

CLSE
0.9%
PXI

-

Financial Services

CLSE
-2.5%
PXI

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLSE vs. PXI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLSE
CLSE Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
CLSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLSE Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
CLSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLSE Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

PXI
PXI Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
PXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXI Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
PXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXI Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLSE vs. PXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) and Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF (PXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLSEPXIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.84

2.05

+1.79

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.20

2.63

+2.58

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.67

1.33

+0.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

10.55

4.04

+6.51

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

39.58

12.41

+27.16

CLSE vs. PXI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLSE Sharpe Ratio is 3.84, which is higher than the PXI Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLSE and PXI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLSEPXIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.84

2.05

+1.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.59

0.16

+1.43

Drawdowns

CLSE vs. PXI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLSE drawdown since its inception was -16.45%, smaller than the maximum PXI drawdown of -85.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSE and PXI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLSEPXIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.45%

-85.08%

+68.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.85%

-10.83%

+5.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.45%

-30.74%

+14.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.27%

+4.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.59%

-29.44%

+25.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.29%

3.52%

-2.23%

Volatility

CLSE vs. PXI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) is 4.31%, while Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF (PXI) has a volatility of 7.76%. This indicates that CLSE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLSEPXIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.31%

7.76%

-3.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.21%

16.34%

-6.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.32%

21.43%

-8.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.88%

33.47%

-19.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.88%

37.19%

-23.31%

CLSE vs. PXI - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLSE has a 1.56% expense ratio, which is higher than PXI's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

CLSE vs. PXI - Dividend Comparison

CLSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, less than PXI's 1.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CLSE
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
0.76%0.95%0.93%1.21%0.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PXI
Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF
1.29%1.81%1.52%1.82%3.14%0.57%1.72%2.80%0.93%0.80%0.73%2.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


CLSE and PXI have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PXI has higher volatility (7.76%) compared to CLSE (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLSE dropped -16.45% vs PXI's -85.08%.

On 3-year performance, CLSE leads with 32.39% vs 18.11% for PXI. On fees, PXI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, CLSE has been the lower-risk option at 4.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, CLSE has performed better with a 32.39% return vs 18.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PXI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.56% for CLSE.

PXI has the higher dividend yield at 1.29%, compared with 0.76% for CLSE.

CLSE is categorized as Long-Short, while PXI is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Convergence Investment Partners and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.56% for CLSE and 0.60% for PXI.

CLSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.84 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLSE and PXI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer