CLSA.TO vs. BDIV.TO
CLSA.TO (Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF) and BDIV.TO (Brompton Global Dividend Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CLSA.TO is a Dividend fund actively managed by Brompton, while BDIV.TO is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Brompton. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CLSA.TO returned 88.08% vs 16.66% for BDIV.TO. Their 0.43 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CLSA.TO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for BDIV.TO.
Performance
CLSA.TO vs. BDIV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLSA.TO achieves a 40.42% return, which is significantly higher than BDIV.TO's 8.55% return.
CLSA.TO
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 3.42%
- 6M
- 37.13%
- YTD
- 40.42%
- 1Y
- 88.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 78.89%
BDIV.TO
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -3.35%
- 6M
- 7.36%
- YTD
- 8.55%
- 1Y
- 16.66%
- 3Y*
- 18.84%
- 5Y*
- 10.04%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.94%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$13.67K | CA$17.11K | CA$20.73K | |
| CA$729.28K | CA$519.46K | CA$344.99K |
CLSA.TO vs. BDIV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CLSA.TO Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF | 40.42% | 57.14% |
BDIV.TO Brompton Global Dividend Growth ETF | 8.55% | 14.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLSA.TO and BDIV.TO is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2025 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLSA.TO vs. BDIV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CLSA.TO
BDIV.TO
CLSA.TO vs. BDIV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF (CLSA.TO) and Brompton Global Dividend Growth ETF (BDIV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CLSA.TO | BDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.07 | 1.25 | +0.81 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.90 | 1.84 | +6.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 34.28 | 7.33 | +26.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLSA.TO vs. BDIV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLSA.TO drawdown since its inception was -11.73%, smaller than the maximum BDIV.TO drawdown of -36.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSA.TO and BDIV.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLSA.TO | BDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.73% | -36.44% | +24.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.78% | -9.11% | -1.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.67% | -4.45% | +2.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.25% | -6.56% | +5.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.48% | 2.28% | +0.20% |
Volatility
CLSA.TO vs. BDIV.TO - Volatility Comparison
Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF (CLSA.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.66% compared to Brompton Global Dividend Growth ETF (BDIV.TO) at 3.30%. This indicates that CLSA.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDIV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLSA.TO | BDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.66% | 3.30% | +2.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.42% | 10.10% | +3.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.12% | 11.98% | +3.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.47% | 14.65% | +1.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.47% | 18.66% | -2.19% |
CLSA.TO vs. BDIV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLSA.TO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than BDIV.TO's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLSA.TO vs. BDIV.TO - Dividend Comparison
CLSA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.55%, more than BDIV.TO's 5.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDIV.TO Brompton Global Dividend Growth ETF | 5.97% | 6.05% | 6.43% | 7.21% | 7.11% | 5.30% | 6.12% | 5.23% |
CLSA.TO Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF | 10.55% | 7.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLSA.TO and BDIV.TO have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CLSA.TO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CLSA.TO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for BDIV.TO.
CLSA.TO is categorized as Dividend, while BDIV.TO is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for CLSA.TO and 0.96% for BDIV.TO.
Find the right allocation for CLSA.TO and BDIV.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer