PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLSA.TO vs. BMAX.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CLSA.TO vs. BMAX.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF (CLSA.TO) and Brompton Enhanced Multi-Asset Income ETF (BMAX.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CLSA.TO vs. BMAX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CLSA.TO having a -2.42% return and BMAX.TO slightly lower at -2.51%.


CLSA.TO

1D
0.04%
1M
-7.65%
YTD
-2.42%
6M
14.55%
1Y
53.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BMAX.TO

1D
1.60%
1M
-6.63%
YTD
-2.51%
6M
0.67%
1Y
13.77%
3Y*
14.86%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CLSA.TO vs. BMAX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLSA.TO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than BMAX.TO's 2.62% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CLSA.TO vs. BMAX.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLSA.TO
CLSA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CLSA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLSA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLSA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
CLSA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLSA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

BMAX.TO
BMAX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
BMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMAX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMAX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
BMAX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMAX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLSA.TO vs. BMAX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF (CLSA.TO) and Brompton Enhanced Multi-Asset Income ETF (BMAX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLSA.TOBMAX.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.16

0.89

+2.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.73

1.29

+2.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.21

+0.42

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.90

1.24

+3.67

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.65

5.41

+14.24

CLSA.TO vs. BMAX.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLSA.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.16, which is higher than the BMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLSA.TO and BMAX.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLSA.TOBMAX.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.16

0.89

+2.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.02

1.16

+1.87

Correlation

The correlation between CLSA.TO and BMAX.TO is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

CLSA.TO vs. BMAX.TO - Dividend Comparison

CLSA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.32%, more than BMAX.TO's 9.43% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
CLSA.TO
Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF
10.32%7.99%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BMAX.TO
Brompton Enhanced Multi-Asset Income ETF
9.43%9.70%9.64%9.55%2.41%

Drawdowns

CLSA.TO vs. BMAX.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLSA.TO drawdown since its inception was -11.73%, smaller than the maximum BMAX.TO drawdown of -15.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSA.TO and BMAX.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CLSA.TOBMAX.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.73%

-15.42%

+3.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.78%

-11.30%

+0.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.62%

-7.89%

-0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.45%

-1.92%

+0.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

2.59%

+0.10%

Volatility

CLSA.TO vs. BMAX.TO - Volatility Comparison

Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF (CLSA.TO) has a higher volatility of 9.01% compared to Brompton Enhanced Multi-Asset Income ETF (BMAX.TO) at 4.71%. This indicates that CLSA.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BMAX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CLSA.TOBMAX.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.01%

4.71%

+4.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.96%

8.22%

+3.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.02%

15.51%

+1.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.01%

13.14%

+3.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.01%

13.14%

+3.87%