BDIV.TO vs. BLOV.TO
BDIV.TO (Brompton Global Dividend Growth ETF) and BLOV.TO (Brompton North American Low Volatility Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BDIV.TO is a Global Equity Income fund actively managed by Brompton, while BLOV.TO is a Dividend fund actively managed by Brompton. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, BDIV.TO returned 10.85%/yr vs 8.19%/yr for BLOV.TO. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BDIV.TO vs. BLOV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BDIV.TO achieves a 10.93% return, which is significantly lower than BLOV.TO's 13.38% return.
BDIV.TO
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- 6M
- 8.69%
- YTD
- 10.93%
- 1Y
- 20.16%
- 3Y*
- 20.02%
- 5Y*
- 10.85%
- 10Y*
- —
BLOV.TO
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 1.49%
- 6M
- 12.19%
- YTD
- 13.38%
- 1Y
- 19.69%
- 3Y*
- 12.75%
- 5Y*
- 8.19%
- 10Y*
- —
BDIV.TO vs. BLOV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDIV.TO Brompton Global Dividend Growth ETF | 10.93% | 18.14% | 25.34% | 11.23% | -16.24% | 22.15% | 21.09% |
BLOV.TO Brompton North American Low Volatility Dividend ETF | 13.38% | 14.08% | 11.35% | -1.53% | -6.53% | 21.12% | 8.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between BDIV.TO and BLOV.TO is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2020 | 0.28 |
The correlation between BDIV.TO and BLOV.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.31 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BDIV.TO vs. BLOV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BDIV.TO
BLOV.TO
BDIV.TO vs. BLOV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brompton Global Dividend Growth ETF (BDIV.TO) and Brompton North American Low Volatility Dividend ETF (BLOV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BDIV.TO | BLOV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.45 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.22 | 3.95 | -1.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.64 | 13.24 | -3.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BDIV.TO vs. BLOV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDIV.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.44%, smaller than the maximum BLOV.TO drawdown of -46.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDIV.TO and BLOV.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BDIV.TO | BLOV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.44% | -46.98% | +10.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.11% | -5.23% | -3.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.65% | -41.86% | +28.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.34% | -46.98% | +22.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.36% | -1.43% | -0.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.57% | -4.48% | -2.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.10% | 1.56% | +0.54% |
Volatility
BDIV.TO vs. BLOV.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Brompton Global Dividend Growth ETF (BDIV.TO) is 3.94%, while Brompton North American Low Volatility Dividend ETF (BLOV.TO) has a volatility of 4.96%. This indicates that BDIV.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLOV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BDIV.TO | BLOV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.94% | 4.96% | -1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.00% | 7.78% | +2.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.89% | 9.20% | +2.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.72% | 33.19% | -18.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.70% | 30.18% | -11.48% |
Dividends
BDIV.TO vs. BLOV.TO - Dividend Comparison
BDIV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.74%, more than BLOV.TO's 3.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDIV.TO Brompton Global Dividend Growth ETF | 5.74% | 6.05% | 6.43% | 7.21% | 7.11% | 5.30% | 6.12% | 5.23% |
BLOV.TO Brompton North American Low Volatility Dividend ETF | 3.71% | 4.13% | 4.51% | 4.80% | 4.25% | 3.19% | 2.45% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BDIV.TO and BLOV.TO have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BDIV.TO is categorized as Global Equity Income, while BLOV.TO is Dividend.
Find the right allocation for BDIV.TO and BLOV.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer