BDIV.TO vs. EDGF.TO
BDIV.TO (Brompton Global Dividend Growth ETF) and EDGF.TO (Brompton European Dividend Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BDIV.TO is a Global Equity Income fund actively managed by Brompton, while EDGF.TO is a Europe Equities fund actively managed by Brompton. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, BDIV.TO returned 10.85%/yr vs 6.72%/yr for EDGF.TO. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BDIV.TO vs. EDGF.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BDIV.TO achieves a 10.93% return, which is significantly higher than EDGF.TO's 4.20% return.
BDIV.TO
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- 6M
- 8.69%
- YTD
- 10.93%
- 1Y
- 20.16%
- 3Y*
- 20.02%
- 5Y*
- 10.85%
- 10Y*
- —
EDGF.TO
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -1.31%
- 6M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 4.20%
- 1Y
- 9.16%
- 3Y*
- 13.08%
- 5Y*
- 6.72%
- 10Y*
- —
BDIV.TO vs. EDGF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDIV.TO Brompton Global Dividend Growth ETF | 10.93% | 18.14% | 25.34% | 11.23% | -16.24% | 22.15% | -0.56% | 22.02% | -6.67% |
EDGF.TO Brompton European Dividend Growth ETF | 4.20% | 17.25% | 14.32% | 12.04% | -19.33% | 24.90% | 0.85% | 34.25% | -4.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between BDIV.TO and EDGF.TO is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2018 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BDIV.TO vs. EDGF.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BDIV.TO
EDGF.TO
BDIV.TO vs. EDGF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brompton Global Dividend Growth ETF (BDIV.TO) and Brompton European Dividend Growth ETF (EDGF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BDIV.TO | EDGF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.12 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.22 | 0.76 | +1.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.64 | 2.15 | +7.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BDIV.TO vs. EDGF.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDIV.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.44%, smaller than the maximum EDGF.TO drawdown of -38.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDIV.TO and EDGF.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BDIV.TO | EDGF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.44% | -38.93% | +2.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.11% | -12.18% | +3.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.65% | -16.15% | +2.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.34% | -28.97% | +4.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.36% | -4.07% | +1.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.57% | -7.13% | +0.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.10% | 4.26% | -2.16% |
Volatility
BDIV.TO vs. EDGF.TO - Volatility Comparison
Brompton Global Dividend Growth ETF (BDIV.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.94% compared to Brompton European Dividend Growth ETF (EDGF.TO) at 3.75%. This indicates that BDIV.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EDGF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BDIV.TO | EDGF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.94% | 3.75% | +0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.00% | 11.67% | -1.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.89% | 14.77% | -2.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.72% | 18.23% | -3.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.70% | 20.90% | -2.20% |
Dividends
BDIV.TO vs. EDGF.TO - Dividend Comparison
BDIV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.74%, less than EDGF.TO's 6.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDIV.TO Brompton Global Dividend Growth ETF | 5.74% | 6.05% | 6.43% | 7.21% | 7.11% | 5.30% | 6.12% | 5.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EDGF.TO Brompton European Dividend Growth ETF | 6.30% | 5.70% | 5.66% | 5.71% | 5.74% | 4.16% | 4.97% | 4.75% | 6.06% | 2.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BDIV.TO and EDGF.TO have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BDIV.TO is categorized as Global Equity Income, while EDGF.TO is Europe Equities.
Find the right allocation for BDIV.TO and EDGF.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer