CLS.TO vs. TEC.TO
CLS.TO (Celestica Inc.) is a stock, while TEC.TO (TD Global Technology Leaders Index ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global Technology Leaders Index (CA NTR). Over the past 5 years, CLS.TO returned 122.50%/yr vs 18.75%/yr for TEC.TO. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CLS.TO vs. TEC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLS.TO achieves a 35.52% return, which is significantly higher than TEC.TO's 12.77% return.
CLS.TO
- 1D
- 2.22%
- 1M
- 11.19%
- YTD
- 35.52%
- 6M
- 30.45%
- 1Y
- 223.16%
- 3Y*
- 212.27%
- 5Y*
- 122.50%
- 10Y*
- 44.95%
TEC.TO
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 12.77%
- 6M
- 13.20%
- 1Y
- 35.38%
- 3Y*
- 28.56%
- 5Y*
- 18.75%
- 10Y*
- —
CLS.TO vs. TEC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLS.TO Celestica Inc. | 35.52% | 206.05% | 241.82% | 154.33% | 8.23% | 37.29% | -4.64% | 8.90% |
TEC.TO TD Global Technology Leaders Index ETF | 12.77% | 15.45% | 45.60% | 53.28% | -32.20% | 25.46% | 47.54% | 12.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLS.TO and TEC.TO is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2019 | 0.47 |
The correlation between CLS.TO and TEC.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLS.TO vs. TEC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CLS.TO
TEC.TO
CLS.TO vs. TEC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celestica Inc. (CLS.TO) and TD Global Technology Leaders Index ETF (TEC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CLS.TO | TEC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.33 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.64 | 1.90 | +4.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.31 | 5.59 | +10.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLS.TO vs. TEC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLS.TO drawdown since its inception was -79.32%, which is greater than TEC.TO's maximum drawdown of -35.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLS.TO and TEC.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLS.TO | TEC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.32% | -35.31% | -44.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.71% | -17.52% | -14.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -54.25% | -25.01% | -29.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.25% | -35.31% | -18.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.72% | -5.07% | -10.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.84% | -8.03% | -20.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.89% | 5.95% | +6.94% |
Volatility
CLS.TO vs. TEC.TO - Volatility Comparison
Celestica Inc. (CLS.TO) has a higher volatility of 27.86% compared to TD Global Technology Leaders Index ETF (TEC.TO) at 7.15%. This indicates that CLS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TEC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLS.TO | TEC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.86% | 7.15% | +20.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 55.27% | 14.11% | +41.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.69% | 17.72% | +53.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.60% | 22.45% | +34.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.83% | 23.83% | +25.00% |
Dividends
CLS.TO vs. TEC.TO - Dividend Comparison
CLS.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TEC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLS.TO Celestica Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TEC.TO TD Global Technology Leaders Index ETF | 0.10% | 0.13% | 0.12% | 0.21% | 0.31% | 0.22% | 0.33% | 0.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLS.TO and TEC.TO have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CLS.TO and TEC.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer