PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLS.TO vs. ORCL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CLS.TO vs. ORCL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Celestica Inc. (CLS.TO) and Oracle Corporation (ORCL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CLS.TO is traded in CAD, while ORCL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ORCL values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLS.TO achieves a 32.58% return, which is significantly higher than ORCL's 11.34% return. Over the past 10 years, CLS.TO has outperformed ORCL with an annualized return of 44.44%, while ORCL has yielded a comparatively lower 21.40% annualized return.


CLS.TO

1D
3.80%
1M
4.71%
YTD
32.58%
6M
13.91%
1Y
225.20%
3Y*
213.80%
5Y*
120.83%
10Y*
44.44%

ORCL

1D
-0.60%
1M
10.34%
YTD
11.34%
6M
-2.60%
1Y
25.44%
3Y*
27.75%
5Y*
25.29%
10Y*
21.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLS.TO vs. ORCL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CLS.TO
Celestica Inc.
32.58%206.05%241.82%154.33%8.23%37.29%-4.64%-9.95%-9.26%-17.16%
ORCL
Oracle Corporation
11.34%12.74%73.54%27.83%1.40%36.82%21.30%14.42%5.19%16.48%

Correlation

The correlation between CLS.TO and ORCL is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2006

0.29

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CLS.TO:

CA$62.28B

ORCL:

$617.24B

EPS

CLS.TO:

CA$8.28

ORCL:

$5.56

PE Ratio

CLS.TO:

64.97

ORCL:

38.09

PEG Ratio

CLS.TO:

0.87

ORCL:

8.54

PS Ratio

CLS.TO:

4.52

ORCL:

9.64

PB Ratio

CLS.TO:

29.68

ORCL:

15.81

Total Revenue (TTM)

CLS.TO:

CA$13.81B

ORCL:

$64.08B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CLS.TO:

CA$1.60B

ORCL:

$58.10B

EBITDA (TTM)

CLS.TO:

CA$1.36B

ORCL:

$17.85B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLS.TO vs. ORCL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLS.TO
CLS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CLS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
CLS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

ORCL
ORCL Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
ORCL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ORCL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
ORCL Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
ORCL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
ORCL Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLS.TO vs. ORCL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celestica Inc. (CLS.TO) and Oracle Corporation (ORCL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLS.TOORCLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.13

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.15

0.43

+6.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.88

0.72

+17.15

CLS.TO vs. ORCL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.17, which is higher than the ORCL Sharpe Ratio of 0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLS.TO and ORCL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLS.TOORCLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.17

0.39

+2.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.16

0.60

+1.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

0.61

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.46

+0.01

Drawdowns

CLS.TO vs. ORCL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLS.TO drawdown since its inception was -79.32%, which is greater than ORCL's maximum drawdown of -58.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLS.TO and ORCL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLS.TOORCLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.32%

-58.78%

-20.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.71%

-58.78%

+27.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.25%

-58.78%

+4.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.25%

-58.78%

+4.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.32%

-58.78%

-20.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.55%

-34.52%

+16.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.86%

-10.19%

-18.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.66%

35.21%

-22.55%

Volatility

CLS.TO vs. ORCL - Volatility Comparison

Celestica Inc. (CLS.TO) has a higher volatility of 26.92% compared to Oracle Corporation (ORCL) at 21.47%. This indicates that CLS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ORCL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLS.TOORCLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.92%

21.47%

+5.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.95%

42.40%

+12.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

71.57%

65.54%

+6.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.52%

42.33%

+14.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.79%

35.48%

+13.31%

Dividends

CLS.TO vs. ORCL - Dividend Comparison

CLS.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ORCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CLS.TO
Celestica Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ORCL
Oracle Corporation
0.94%0.97%0.96%1.44%1.57%1.38%1.48%1.72%1.68%1.52%1.56%1.56%

Financials

CLS.TO vs. ORCL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Celestica Inc. and Oracle Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
4.05B
17.19B
(CLS.TO) Total Revenue
(ORCL) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. CLS.TO values in CAD, ORCL values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


CLS.TO and ORCL have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLS.TO and ORCL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer