CLS.TO vs. BMO.TO
CLS.TO (Celestica Inc.) and BMO.TO (Bank of Montreal) are both stocks. CLS.TO operates in Electronic Components (Technology), while BMO.TO operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, CLS.TO returned 44.95%/yr vs 15.95%/yr for BMO.TO. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CLS.TO vs. BMO.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CLS.TO having a 35.52% return and BMO.TO slightly lower at 34.22%. Over the past 10 years, CLS.TO has outperformed BMO.TO with an annualized return of 44.95%, while BMO.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 15.95% annualized return.
CLS.TO
- 1D
- 2.22%
- 1M
- 7.85%
- YTD
- 35.52%
- 6M
- 30.45%
- 1Y
- 209.23%
- 3Y*
- 212.27%
- 5Y*
- 122.50%
- 10Y*
- 44.95%
BMO.TO
- 1D
- 1.21%
- 1M
- 14.20%
- YTD
- 34.22%
- 6M
- 31.97%
- 1Y
- 65.34%
- 3Y*
- 31.53%
- 5Y*
- 18.07%
- 10Y*
- 15.95%
CLS.TO vs. BMO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLS.TO Celestica Inc. | 35.52% | 206.05% | 241.82% | 154.33% | 8.23% | 37.29% | -4.64% | -9.95% | -9.26% | -17.16% |
BMO.TO Bank of Montreal | 34.22% | 33.33% | 11.74% | 12.19% | -6.19% | 45.89% | 1.29% | 17.51% | -7.94% | 7.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLS.TO and BMO.TO is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006 | 0.33 |
Fundamentals
CLS.TO:
CA$63.66B
BMO.TO:
CA$165.75B
CLS.TO:
$8.28
BMO.TO:
CA$13.65
CLS.TO:
47.51
BMO.TO:
17.23
CLS.TO:
0.64
BMO.TO:
0.79
CLS.TO:
3.30
BMO.TO:
2.18
CLS.TO:
21.70
BMO.TO:
2.13
CLS.TO:
$13.81B
BMO.TO:
CA$77.04B
CLS.TO:
$1.60B
BMO.TO:
CA$34.47B
CLS.TO:
$1.36B
BMO.TO:
CA$14.20B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLS.TO vs. BMO.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CLS.TO
BMO.TO
CLS.TO vs. BMO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celestica Inc. (CLS.TO) and Bank of Montreal (BMO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CLS.TO | BMO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.62 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.64 | 6.49 | +0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.31 | 23.72 | -7.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLS.TO vs. BMO.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLS.TO drawdown since its inception was -79.32%, which is greater than BMO.TO's maximum drawdown of -62.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLS.TO and BMO.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLS.TO | BMO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.32% | -62.39% | -16.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.71% | -10.12% | -21.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -54.25% | -16.57% | -37.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.25% | -27.47% | -26.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.32% | -45.59% | -33.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.72% | 0.00% | -15.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.84% | -9.03% | -19.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.89% | 2.78% | +10.11% |
Volatility
CLS.TO vs. BMO.TO - Volatility Comparison
Celestica Inc. (CLS.TO) has a higher volatility of 27.86% compared to Bank of Montreal (BMO.TO) at 4.56%. This indicates that CLS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BMO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLS.TO | BMO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.86% | 4.56% | +23.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 55.27% | 14.51% | +40.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.69% | 17.79% | +53.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.60% | 18.36% | +38.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.83% | 21.00% | +27.83% |
Dividends
CLS.TO vs. BMO.TO - Dividend Comparison
CLS.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BMO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMO.TO Bank of Montreal | 2.81% | 3.61% | 4.39% | 4.42% | 4.44% | 3.11% | 4.38% | 4.03% | 4.24% | 3.54% | 3.52% | 4.15% |
CLS.TO Celestica Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CLS.TO vs. BMO.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Celestica Inc. and Bank of Montreal. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CLS.TO vs. BMO.TO - Profitability Comparison
CLS.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 437.20M and revenue of 4.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.8%.
BMO.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bank of Montreal reported a gross profit of 8.79B and revenue of 19.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.6%.
CLS.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 267.70M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.6%.
BMO.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bank of Montreal reported an operating income of 3.50B and revenue of 19.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.2%.
CLS.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 212.30M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.
BMO.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bank of Montreal reported a net income of 2.63B and revenue of 19.27B, resulting in a net margin of 13.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CLS.TO and BMO.TO have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CLS.TO and BMO.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer