CLS.TO vs. AVAV
CLS.TO (Celestica Inc.) and AVAV (AeroVironment, Inc.) are both stocks. CLS.TO operates in Electronic Components (Technology), while AVAV operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, CLS.TO returned 40.06%/yr vs 19.02%/yr for AVAV. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CLS.TO vs. AVAV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CLS.TO is traded in CAD, while AVAV is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AVAV values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLS.TO achieves a 5.93% return, which is significantly higher than AVAV's -36.40% return. Over the past 10 years, CLS.TO has outperformed AVAV with an annualized return of 40.06%, while AVAV has yielded a comparatively lower 19.02% annualized return.
CLS.TO
- 1D
- -8.67%
- 1M
- -16.62%
- 6M
- 3.50%
- YTD
- 5.93%
- 1Y
- 92.16%
- 3Y*
- 170.29%
- 5Y*
- 115.61%
- 10Y*
- 40.06%
- ALL TIME*
- 20.52%
AVAV
- 1D
- -5.77%
- 1M
- 4.29%
- 6M
- -50.33%
- YTD
- -36.40%
- 1Y
- -42.88%
- 3Y*
- 18.43%
- 5Y*
- 11.71%
- 10Y*
- 19.02%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.60%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$302.83M | CA$535.95M | CA$381.90M | |
CLS.TO Celestica Inc. | CA$159.61M | CA$161.91M | CA$209.67M |
CLS.TO vs. AVAV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLS.TO Celestica Inc. | 5.93% | 206.05% | 241.82% | 154.33% | 8.23% | 37.29% | -4.64% | -9.95% | -9.26% | -17.16% |
AVAV AeroVironment, Inc. | -36.40% | 50.01% | 32.43% | 43.64% | 46.85% | -28.65% | 37.41% | -12.88% | 31.17% | 95.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLS.TO and AVAV is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2007 | 0.25 |
Fundamentals
CLS.TO:
CA$49.45B
AVAV:
$7.57B
CLS.TO:
$8.29
AVAV:
-$5.41
CLS.TO:
2.56
AVAV:
5.17
CLS.TO:
16.85
AVAV:
1.72
CLS.TO:
$13.81B
AVAV:
$1.42B
CLS.TO:
$1.60B
AVAV:
$246.70M
CLS.TO:
$1.36B
AVAV:
-$6.04M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLS.TO vs. AVAV — Risk / Return Rank
CLS.TO
AVAV
CLS.TO vs. AVAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celestica Inc. (CLS.TO) and AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CLS.TO | AVAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 0.94 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.62 | -0.65 | +3.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.99 | -1.06 | +7.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLS.TO vs. AVAV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLS.TO drawdown since its inception was -79.32%, which is greater than AVAV's maximum drawdown of -66.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLS.TO and AVAV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLS.TO | AVAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.32% | -66.09% | -13.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.38% | -66.09% | +30.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -54.25% | -66.09% | +11.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.25% | -66.09% | +11.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.32% | -66.09% | -13.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.12% | -63.28% | +29.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.95% | -31.73% | +2.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.44% | 40.45% | -25.01% |
Volatility
CLS.TO vs. AVAV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Celestica Inc. (CLS.TO) is 22.74%, while AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV) has a volatility of 28.54%. This indicates that CLS.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVAV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLS.TO | AVAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.74% | 28.54% | -5.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 55.70% | 58.70% | -3.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 74.44% | 74.20% | +0.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.51% | 57.77% | -0.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.30% | 53.21% | -3.91% |
Dividends
CLS.TO vs. AVAV - Dividend Comparison
Neither CLS.TO nor AVAV has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
CLS.TO vs. AVAV - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Celestica Inc. and AeroVironment, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CLS.TO vs. AVAV - Profitability Comparison
CLS.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 437.20M and revenue of 4.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.8%.
AVAV - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, AeroVironment, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 80.12M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CLS.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 267.70M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.6%.
AVAV - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, AeroVironment, Inc. reported an operating income of 56.94M and revenue of 80.12M, resulting in an operating margin of 71.1%.
CLS.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 212.30M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.
AVAV - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, AeroVironment, Inc. reported a net income of -24.10M and revenue of 80.12M, resulting in a net margin of -30.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CLS.TO and AVAV have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CLS.TO and AVAV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer