Correlation
The correlation between CLPBY and SCHG is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
CLPBY vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about Coloplast A (CLPBY) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Total Return Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CLPBY or SCHG.
Performance
CLPBY vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
CLPBY:
-0.78
SCHG:
0.68
CLPBY:
-1.07
SCHG:
0.98
CLPBY:
0.87
SCHG:
1.13
CLPBY:
-0.44
SCHG:
0.63
CLPBY:
-1.24
SCHG:
2.07
CLPBY:
15.81%
SCHG:
7.13%
CLPBY:
22.96%
SCHG:
25.37%
CLPBY:
-47.03%
SCHG:
-34.59%
CLPBY:
-43.76%
SCHG:
-5.20%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLPBY achieves a -11.29% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's -1.01% return. Over the past 10 years, CLPBY has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 5.13%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 15.84% annualized return.
CLPBY
-11.29%
-9.18%
-21.57%
-17.71%
-4.35%
-8.45%
5.13%
SCHG
-1.01%
7.20%
-0.61%
17.22%
21.07%
18.23%
15.84%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CLPBY vs. SCHG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CLPBY
SCHG
CLPBY vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Coloplast A (CLPBY) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
CLPBY vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
CLPBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, more than SCHG's 0.41% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLPBY Coloplast A | 3.27% | 2.85% | 2.68% | 2.41% | 1.67% | 1.86% | 2.03% | 2.67% | 2.90% | 2.92% | 2.28% | 1.68% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.41% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% | 1.09% |
Drawdowns
CLPBY vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLPBY drawdown since its inception was -47.03%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLPBY and SCHG.
Loading data...
Volatility
CLPBY vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
Coloplast A (CLPBY) has a higher volatility of 9.39% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 5.75%. This indicates that CLPBY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...