CLOZ vs. AAAC

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

CLOZ (Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF) and AAAC (Columbia AAA CLO ETF) are both CLO funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CLOZ charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for AAAC.

Performance

CLOZ vs. AAAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ) and Columbia AAA CLO ETF (AAAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLOZ achieves a 2.55% return, which is significantly higher than AAAC's 2.06% return.

CLOZ

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 1.08%
• YTD: 2.55%
• 6M: 3.27%
• 1Y: 6.17%
• 3Y*: 10.63%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AAAC

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.40%
• YTD: 2.06%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLOZ vs. AAAC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CLOZ Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF	2.55%	0.39%
AAAC Columbia AAA CLO ETF	2.06%	0.20%

Correlation

The correlation between CLOZ and AAAC is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025	0.20

Return for Risk

CLOZ vs. AAAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLOZ

CLOZ Risk / Return Rank: 48
CLOZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
CLOZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
CLOZ Omega Ratio Rank: 75
CLOZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
CLOZ Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLOZ vs. AAAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ) and Columbia AAA CLO ETF (AAAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CLOZ	AAAC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.79	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.29	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.56	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.19	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CLOZ	AAAC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.79	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.77	5.59	-2.82

Drawdowns

CLOZ vs. AAAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLOZ drawdown since its inception was -5.32%, which is greater than AAAC's maximum drawdown of -0.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOZ and AAAC.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLOZ	AAAC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.32%	-0.55%	-4.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.90%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.32%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.10%	0.00%	-0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.38%	-0.04%	-0.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.17%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CLOZ	AAAC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.55%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.13%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.45%	0.89%	+2.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.81%	0.89%	+2.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.81%	0.89%	+2.92%

CLOZ vs. AAAC - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLOZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than AAAC's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

CLOZ vs. AAAC - Dividend Comparison

CLOZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.01%, more than AAAC's 2.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AAAC Columbia AAA CLO ETF	2.27%	0.03%	0.00%	0.00%
CLOZ Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF	8.01%	7.63%	9.09%	8.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLOZ and AAAC in my portfolio?

CLOZ and AAAC have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CLOZ or AAAC?

On fees, AAAC is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CLOZ or AAAC?

AAAC is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CLOZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CLOZ or AAAC?

CLOZ has the higher dividend yield at 8.01%, compared with 2.27% for AAAC.

What is the main difference between CLOZ and AAAC?

They also come from different issuers: Panagram and Columbia Threadneedle. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CLOZ and 0.20% for AAAC.