CLOZ vs. TFLR

In the year-to-date period, CLOZ achieves a 1.57% return, which is significantly higher than TFLR's 1.21% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

CLOZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than TFLR's 0.60% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ) and T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF (TFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CLOZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is higher than the TFLR Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLOZ and TFLR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

CLOZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.57%, more than TFLR's 7.18% yield.

The maximum CLOZ drawdown since its inception was -5.33%, which is greater than TFLR's maximum drawdown of -4.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOZ and TFLR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ) has a higher volatility of 2.21% compared to T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF (TFLR) at 0.95%. This indicates that CLOZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TFLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.