PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CLOZ vs. TFLR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


CLOZTFLR
YTD Return10.10%7.48%
1Y Return13.83%10.26%
Sharpe Ratio6.344.05
Sortino Ratio9.396.43
Omega Ratio3.221.97
Calmar Ratio10.079.95
Martin Ratio61.1959.38
Ulcer Index0.23%0.18%
Daily Std Dev2.20%2.59%
Max Drawdown-2.70%-1.48%
Current Drawdown0.00%0.00%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.1

The correlation between CLOZ and TFLR is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

CLOZ vs. TFLR - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CLOZ achieves a 10.10% return, which is significantly higher than TFLR's 7.48% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.22%
3.85%
CLOZ
TFLR

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CLOZ vs. TFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLOZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than TFLR's 0.60% expense ratio.


TFLR
T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF
Expense ratio chart for TFLR: current value at 0.60% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.60%
Expense ratio chart for CLOZ: current value at 0.50% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.50%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CLOZ vs. TFLR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ) and T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF (TFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLOZ
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CLOZ, currently valued at 6.34, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.006.34
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CLOZ, currently valued at 9.39, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.009.39
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CLOZ, currently valued at 3.22, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.003.22
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CLOZ, currently valued at 10.07, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0010.07
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CLOZ, currently valued at 61.19, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0061.19
TFLR
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for TFLR, currently valued at 4.05, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.004.05
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for TFLR, currently valued at 6.43, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.006.43
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for TFLR, currently valued at 1.97, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.97
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for TFLR, currently valued at 9.95, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.009.95
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for TFLR, currently valued at 59.38, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0059.38

CLOZ vs. TFLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLOZ Sharpe Ratio is 6.34, which is higher than the TFLR Sharpe Ratio of 4.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLOZ and TFLR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio3.004.005.006.007.008.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
6.34
4.05
CLOZ
TFLR

Dividends

CLOZ vs. TFLR - Dividend Comparison

CLOZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.73%, more than TFLR's 8.25% yield.


TTM20232022
CLOZ
Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF
9.73%8.81%0.00%
TFLR
T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF
8.25%7.76%0.58%

Drawdowns

CLOZ vs. TFLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLOZ drawdown since its inception was -2.70%, which is greater than TFLR's maximum drawdown of -1.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOZ and TFLR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-1.40%-1.20%-1.00%-0.80%-0.60%-0.40%-0.20%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember00
CLOZ
TFLR

Volatility

CLOZ vs. TFLR - Volatility Comparison

Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ) has a higher volatility of 0.48% compared to T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF (TFLR) at 0.42%. This indicates that CLOZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TFLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.20%0.40%0.60%0.80%1.00%1.20%1.40%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.48%
0.42%
CLOZ
TFLR