CLOX vs. UTF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CLOX (Panagram AAA CLO ETF) is CLO fund actively managed by Panagram, while UTF (Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc) is a stock. Over the past year, CLOX returned 4.96% vs 11.33% for UTF. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CLOX vs. UTF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Panagram AAA CLO ETF (CLOX) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLOX achieves a 1.97% return, which is significantly lower than UTF's 14.60% return.

CLOX

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.47%
• YTD: 1.97%
• 6M: 2.36%
• 1Y: 4.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UTF

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: -0.10%
• YTD: 14.60%
• 6M: 16.03%
• 1Y: 11.33%
• 3Y*: 16.30%
• 5Y*: 6.39%
• 10Y*: 11.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLOX vs. UTF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CLOX Panagram AAA CLO ETF	1.97%	5.52%	7.16%	3.93%
UTF Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc	14.60%	9.93%	22.37%	-4.41%

Correlation

The correlation between CLOX and UTF is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2023	0.08

The correlation between CLOX and UTF shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CLOX vs. UTF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLOX

CLOX Risk / Return Rank: 96
CLOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
CLOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
CLOX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
CLOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
CLOX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

UTF

UTF Risk / Return Rank: 63
UTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
UTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
UTF Omega Ratio Rank: 59
UTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
UTF Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLOX vs. UTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Panagram AAA CLO ETF (CLOX) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CLOX	UTF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.81	0.92	+2.88
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	6.32	1.35	+4.97
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.90	1.16	+0.74
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.56	1.10	+6.46
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	38.45	2.25	+36.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CLOX vs. UTF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLOX Sharpe Ratio is 3.81, which is higher than the UTF Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLOX and UTF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CLOX	UTF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.81	0.92	+2.88
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.35	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.50	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.96	0.45	+1.51

Drawdowns

CLOX vs. UTF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLOX drawdown since its inception was -4.13%, smaller than the maximum UTF drawdown of -72.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOX and UTF.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLOX	UTF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.13%	-72.62%	+68.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.66%	-10.33%	+9.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-21.06%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-30.28%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-52.53%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.02%	-1.69%	+1.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.08%	-10.37%	+10.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.13%	5.05%	-4.92%

Volatility

CLOX vs. UTF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Panagram AAA CLO ETF (CLOX) is 0.35%, while Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) has a volatility of 2.78%. This indicates that CLOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CLOX	UTF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.35%	2.78%	-2.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.90%	8.39%	-7.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.31%	12.33%	-11.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.33%	18.33%	-15.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.33%	23.37%	-20.04%

Dividends

CLOX vs. UTF - Dividend Comparison

CLOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%, less than UTF's 6.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CLOX Panagram AAA CLO ETF	4.98%	5.18%	6.25%	2.90%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UTF Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc	6.98%	7.62%	7.74%	8.76%	7.75%	6.53%	7.20%	7.10%	10.12%	7.37%	10.51%	8.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLOX and UTF in my portfolio?

CLOX and UTF have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CLOX or UTF?

UTF has higher volatility (2.78%) compared to CLOX (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLOX dropped -4.13% vs UTF's -72.62%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CLOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.81 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.