CLOX vs. EMB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CLOX (Panagram AAA CLO ETF) and EMB (iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CLOX is a CLO fund actively managed by Panagram, while EMB is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the JPMorgan EMBI Global Core Index. CLOX is actively managed, while EMB is passively managed. Over the past year, CLOX returned 4.96% vs 11.56% for EMB. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CLOX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for EMB.

Performance

CLOX vs. EMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Panagram AAA CLO ETF (CLOX) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLOX achieves a 1.97% return, which is significantly higher than EMB's 1.80% return.

CLOX

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.47%
• YTD: 1.97%
• 6M: 2.36%
• 1Y: 4.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EMB

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: 1.29%
• YTD: 1.80%
• 6M: 1.93%
• 1Y: 11.56%
• 3Y*: 9.74%
• 5Y*: 1.86%
• 10Y*: 3.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLOX vs. EMB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CLOX Panagram AAA CLO ETF	1.97%	5.52%	7.16%	3.93%
EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF	1.80%	13.85%	5.54%	4.64%

Correlation

The correlation between CLOX and EMB is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2023	0.07

The correlation between CLOX and EMB shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (all time) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CLOX vs. EMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLOX

CLOX Risk / Return Rank: 96
CLOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
CLOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
CLOX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
CLOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
CLOX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

EMB

EMB Risk / Return Rank: 61
EMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
EMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
EMB Omega Ratio Rank: 66
EMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
EMB Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLOX vs. EMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Panagram AAA CLO ETF (CLOX) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CLOX	EMB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.81	2.09	+1.72
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	6.32	3.05	+3.27
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.90	1.41	+0.50
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.56	2.58	+4.98
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	38.45	11.01	+27.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CLOX vs. EMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLOX Sharpe Ratio is 3.81, which is higher than the EMB Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLOX and EMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CLOX	EMB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.81	2.09	+1.72
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.19	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.33	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.96	0.44	+1.53

Drawdowns

CLOX vs. EMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLOX drawdown since its inception was -4.13%, smaller than the maximum EMB drawdown of -34.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOX and EMB.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLOX	EMB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.13%	-34.70%	+30.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.66%	-4.51%	+3.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-7.95%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.74%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-28.74%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.02%	-0.37%	+0.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.08%	-5.06%	+4.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.13%	1.05%	-0.92%

Volatility

CLOX vs. EMB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Panagram AAA CLO ETF (CLOX) is 0.35%, while iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) has a volatility of 1.85%. This indicates that CLOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CLOX	EMB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.35%	1.85%	-1.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.90%	4.52%	-3.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.31%	5.56%	-4.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.33%	9.75%	-6.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.33%	9.96%	-6.63%

CLOX vs. EMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLOX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than EMB's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

CLOX vs. EMB - Dividend Comparison

CLOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%, less than EMB's 5.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CLOX Panagram AAA CLO ETF	4.98%	5.18%	6.25%	2.90%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF	5.06%	4.98%	5.46%	4.74%	5.04%	3.89%	3.88%	4.51%	5.64%	4.54%	4.83%	4.84%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLOX and EMB in my portfolio?

CLOX and EMB have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CLOX or EMB?

EMB has higher volatility (1.85%) compared to CLOX (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLOX dropped -4.13% vs EMB's -34.70%.

Which ETF is better, CLOX or EMB?

On 1-year performance, EMB leads with 11.56% vs 4.96% for CLOX. On fees, CLOX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CLOX has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CLOX or EMB?

Over the 1-year period, EMB has performed better with a 11.56% return vs 4.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CLOX or EMB?

CLOX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for EMB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CLOX or EMB?

EMB has the higher dividend yield at 5.06%, compared with 4.98% for CLOX.

What is the main difference between CLOX and EMB?

CLOX is categorized as CLO, while EMB is Emerging Markets Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Panagram and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CLOX and 0.39% for EMB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CLOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.81 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.