CLOU vs. SIL
CLOU (Global X Cloud Computing ETF) and SIL (Global X Silver Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CLOU is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Global Cloud Computing Index, while SIL is a Silver fund tracking the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CLOU returned 0.30%/yr vs 15.57%/yr for SIL. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CLOU charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SIL.
Performance
CLOU vs. SIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLOU achieves a 13.35% return, which is significantly higher than SIL's 10.23% return.
CLOU
- 1D
- -2.81%
- 1M
- 21.81%
- YTD
- 13.35%
- 6M
- 13.05%
- 1Y
- 11.58%
- 3Y*
- 10.56%
- 5Y*
- 0.30%
- 10Y*
- —
SIL
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 3.82%
- YTD
- 10.23%
- 6M
- 20.67%
- 1Y
- 102.71%
- 3Y*
- 51.70%
- 5Y*
- 15.57%
- 10Y*
- 11.26%
CLOU vs. SIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLOU Global X Cloud Computing ETF | 13.35% | -5.59% | 5.74% | 41.36% | -39.56% | -3.27% | 77.18% | 4.79% |
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF | 10.23% | 166.16% | 14.62% | 1.31% | -22.83% | -18.35% | 40.30% | 33.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLOU and SIL is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2019 | 0.24 |
The correlation between CLOU and SIL shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.25 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CLOU vs. SIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CLOU
SIL
Technology
-
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
CLOU
SIL
-
Real Estate
CLOU
SIL
-
Communication Services
CLOU
SIL
-
Consumer Cyclical
CLOU
SIL
-
Healthcare
CLOU
SIL
-
Basic Materials
CLOU
-
SIL
Consumer Defensive
CLOU
-
SIL
Energy
CLOU
-
SIL
-
Financial Services
CLOU
-
SIL
-
Industrials
CLOU
-
SIL
-
Utilities
CLOU
-
SIL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLOU vs. SIL — Risk / Return Rank
CLOU
SIL
CLOU vs. SIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CLOU | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.40 | 2.08 | -1.68 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.75 | 2.36 | -1.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.33 | -0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.44 | 3.53 | -3.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.09 | 9.13 | -8.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CLOU | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 | 2.08 | -1.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | 0.40 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.14 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
CLOU vs. SIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLOU drawdown since its inception was -53.74%, smaller than the maximum SIL drawdown of -82.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOU and SIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLOU | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.74% | -82.99% | +29.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.24% | -32.91% | +5.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.18% | -32.91% | -0.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.74% | -55.08% | +1.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.82% | -22.00% | +3.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.42% | -51.46% | +27.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.01% | 12.71% | -1.70% |
Volatility
CLOU vs. SIL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) is 13.10%, while Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) has a volatility of 16.97%. This indicates that CLOU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLOU | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.10% | 16.97% | -3.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.52% | 41.24% | -16.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.26% | 50.12% | -20.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.53% | 39.19% | -8.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.77% | 39.58% | -8.81% |
CLOU vs. SIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLOU has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than SIL's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLOU vs. SIL - Dividend Comparison
CLOU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLOU Global X Cloud Computing ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.76% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF | 1.07% | 1.18% | 2.40% | 0.59% | 0.48% | 1.59% | 1.92% | 1.53% | 1.21% | 0.02% | 3.34% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLOU and SIL have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SIL has higher volatility (16.97%) compared to CLOU (13.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLOU dropped -53.74% vs SIL's -82.99%.
On 5-year performance, SIL leads with 15.57% vs 0.30% for CLOU. On fees, SIL is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, CLOU has been the lower-risk option at 13.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SIL has performed better with a 15.57% return vs 0.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SIL is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for CLOU.
SIL has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 0.00% for CLOU.
CLOU is categorized as Technology Equities, while SIL is Silver. CLOU tracks Indxx Global Cloud Computing Index, while SIL tracks Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for CLOU and 0.65% for SIL.
SIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CLOU and SIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer