CLOU vs. QTUM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CLOU (Global X Cloud Computing ETF) and QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - CLOU tracks the Indxx Global Cloud Computing Index while QTUM tracks the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CLOU returned -5.18%/yr vs 28.34%/yr for QTUM. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CLOU charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for QTUM.

Performance

CLOU vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLOU achieves a -4.95% return, which is significantly lower than QTUM's 49.25% return.

CLOU

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: -5.99%
• YTD: -4.95%
• 6M: -5.99%
• 1Y: -5.37%
• 3Y*: 3.57%
• 5Y*: -5.18%
• 10Y*: —

QTUM

• 1D: -3.12%
• 1M: 6.45%
• YTD: 49.25%
• 6M: 46.84%
• 1Y: 87.39%
• 3Y*: 51.19%
• 5Y*: 28.34%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLOU vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
CLOU Global X Cloud Computing ETF	-4.95%	-5.59%	5.74%	41.36%	-39.56%	-3.27%	77.18%	4.06%
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF	49.25%	36.65%	50.54%	39.86%	-28.80%	35.18%	42.05%	19.02%

Correlation

The correlation between CLOU and QTUM is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.61
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2019	0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between CLOU and QTUM has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

CLOU vs. QTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CLOU	QTUM
Technology	90.7%	81.6%
Communication Services	4.0%	6.6%
Real Estate	3.2%	-
Consumer Cyclical	2.0%	2.1%
Healthcare	0.6%	1.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	0.0%
Industrials	-	8.8%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

CLOU vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLOU

CLOU Risk / Return Rank: 7
CLOU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
CLOU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
CLOU Omega Ratio Rank: 7
CLOU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
CLOU Martin Ratio Rank: 7

QTUM

QTUM Risk / Return Rank: 88
QTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
QTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
QTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 83
QTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
QTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLOU vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CLOU	QTUM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.18	3.02	-3.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.05	3.51	-3.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.47	-0.48
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.20	5.76	-5.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.47	20.75	-21.22

CLOU vs. QTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLOU Sharpe Ratio is -0.18, which is lower than the QTUM Sharpe Ratio of 3.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLOU and QTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CLOU vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLOU drawdown since its inception was -53.74%, which is greater than QTUM's maximum drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOU and QTUM.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLOU	QTUM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.74%	-38.45%	-15.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.24%	-15.26%	-11.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.18%	-25.39%	-7.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.74%	-38.45%	-15.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.93%	-3.21%	-28.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.43%	-8.22%	-16.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.46%	4.23%	+7.23%

Volatility

CLOU vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) is 13.72%, while Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) has a volatility of 14.89%. This indicates that CLOU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CLOU	QTUM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.72%	14.89%	-1.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.33%	23.70%	+1.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.89%	29.10%	+0.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.65%	27.17%	+3.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.76%	27.48%	+3.28%

CLOU vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLOU has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

CLOU vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison

CLOU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CLOU Global X Cloud Computing ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.76%	0.00%	0.05%	0.00%
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF	0.72%	1.01%	0.61%	0.81%	1.46%	0.48%	0.42%	0.61%	0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLOU and QTUM in my portfolio?

CLOU and QTUM have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CLOU or QTUM?

QTUM has higher volatility (14.89%) compared to CLOU (13.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLOU dropped -53.74% vs QTUM's -38.45%.

Which ETF is better, CLOU or QTUM?

On 5-year performance, QTUM leads with 28.34% vs -5.18% for CLOU. On fees, QTUM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, CLOU has been the lower-risk option at 13.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CLOU or QTUM?

Over the 5-year period, QTUM has performed better with a 28.34% return vs -5.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CLOU or QTUM?

QTUM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for CLOU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CLOU or QTUM?

QTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.72%, compared with 0.00% for CLOU.

What is the main difference between CLOU and QTUM?

CLOU tracks Indxx Global Cloud Computing Index, while QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for CLOU and 0.40% for QTUM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.