CLOU vs. OILK
CLOU (Global X Cloud Computing ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CLOU is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Global Cloud Computing Index, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CLOU returned 0.30%/yr vs 17.52%/yr for OILK. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.68% expense ratio.
Performance
CLOU vs. OILK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLOU achieves a 13.35% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 61.95% return.
CLOU
- 1D
- -2.81%
- 1M
- 21.81%
- YTD
- 13.35%
- 6M
- 13.05%
- 1Y
- 11.58%
- 3Y*
- 10.56%
- 5Y*
- 0.30%
- 10Y*
- —
OILK
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 61.95%
- 6M
- 59.31%
- 1Y
- 57.89%
- 3Y*
- 18.48%
- 5Y*
- 17.52%
- 10Y*
- —
CLOU vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLOU Global X Cloud Computing ETF | 13.35% | -5.59% | 5.74% | 41.36% | -39.56% | -3.27% | 77.18% | 4.79% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 61.95% | -11.86% | 8.18% | -0.97% | 27.57% | 63.71% | -61.09% | -4.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLOU and OILK is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2019 | 0.11 |
The correlation between CLOU and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CLOU vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CLOU
OILK
Technology
-
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
CLOU
OILK
-
Real Estate
CLOU
OILK
-
Communication Services
CLOU
OILK
-
Consumer Cyclical
CLOU
OILK
Healthcare
CLOU
OILK
-
Basic Materials
CLOU
-
OILK
-
Consumer Defensive
CLOU
-
OILK
-
Energy
CLOU
-
OILK
-
Financial Services
CLOU
-
OILK
-
Industrials
CLOU
-
OILK
-
Utilities
CLOU
-
OILK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLOU vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank
CLOU
OILK
CLOU vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CLOU | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.40 | 2.03 | -1.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.75 | 2.55 | -1.80 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.34 | -0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.44 | 3.61 | -3.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.09 | 7.33 | -6.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CLOU | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 | 2.03 | -1.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | 0.59 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.11 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
CLOU vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLOU drawdown since its inception was -53.74%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOU and OILK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLOU | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.74% | -83.76% | +30.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.24% | -17.35% | -9.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.18% | -23.42% | -9.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.74% | -34.69% | -19.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.82% | -4.99% | -13.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.42% | -32.62% | +8.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.01% | 8.56% | +2.45% |
Volatility
CLOU vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison
Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) has a higher volatility of 13.10% compared to ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) at 11.11%. This indicates that CLOU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLOU | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.10% | 11.11% | +1.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.52% | 23.24% | +1.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.26% | 28.86% | +0.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.53% | 30.11% | +0.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.77% | 35.98% | -5.21% |
CLOU vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CLOU and OILK have an expense ratio of 0.68%.
Dividends
CLOU vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison
CLOU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OILK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.29%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLOU Global X Cloud Computing ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.76% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 8.29% | 4.79% | 3.11% | 5.80% | 17.32% | 68.82% | 0.13% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 6.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLOU and OILK have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLOU has higher volatility (13.10%) compared to OILK (11.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLOU dropped -53.74% vs OILK's -83.76%.
On 5-year performance, OILK leads with 17.52% vs 0.30% for CLOU. Both ETFs have the same 0.68% expense ratio. On volatility, OILK has been the lower-risk option at 11.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, OILK has performed better with a 17.52% return vs 0.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CLOU and OILK have the same expense ratio: 0.68% per year.
OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.29%, compared with 0.00% for CLOU.
CLOU is categorized as Technology Equities, while OILK is Oil & Gas. CLOU tracks Indxx Global Cloud Computing Index, while OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and ProShares.
OILK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CLOU and OILK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer