CLOD vs. AUMI

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

CLOD (Themes Cloud Computing ETF) and AUMI (Themes Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CLOD is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive Cloud Technology Index, while AUMI is a Gold fund tracking the Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CLOD returned -2.27% vs 46.27% for AUMI. Their 0.19 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.

Performance

CLOD vs. AUMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes Cloud Computing ETF (CLOD) and Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLOD achieves a -0.40% return, which is significantly higher than AUMI's -16.43% return.

CLOD

• 1D: 1.84%
• 1M: 2.61%
• 6M: 10.30%
• YTD: -0.40%
• 1Y: -2.27%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.71%

AUMI

• 1D: -3.44%
• 1M: -4.91%
• 6M: -20.88%
• YTD: -16.43%
• 1Y: 46.27%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 55.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AUMI Themes Gold Miners ETF	$152.80K	$181.46K	$385.06K
CLOD Themes Cloud Computing ETF	$10.26K	$13.57K	$43.79K

CLOD vs. AUMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CLOD Themes Cloud Computing ETF	-0.40%	7.53%	21.03%	0.77%
AUMI Themes Gold Miners ETF	-16.43%	164.18%	30.61%	0.80%

Correlation

The correlation between CLOD and AUMI is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2023	0.19

CLOD vs. AUMI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CLOD	AUMI
Technology	83.5%	0.0%
Consumer Cyclical	7.3%	-
Communication Services	5.9%	0.0%
Industrials	1.5%	-
Financial Services	0.8%	0.2%
Basic Materials	-	99.5%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

CLOD vs. AUMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CLOD

CLOD Risk / Return Rank: 8
CLOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
CLOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
CLOD Omega Ratio Rank: 8
CLOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
CLOD Martin Ratio Rank: 9

AUMI

AUMI Risk / Return Rank: 37
AUMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
AUMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
AUMI Omega Ratio Rank: 41
AUMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
AUMI Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CLOD vs. AUMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Cloud Computing ETF (CLOD) and Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CLOD	AUMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.19	0.98	-1.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.09	1.45	-1.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.19	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.16	1.25	-1.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.33	2.68	-3.01

CLOD vs. AUMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLOD Sharpe Ratio is -0.19, which is lower than the AUMI Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLOD and AUMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CLOD vs. AUMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLOD drawdown since its inception was -31.36%, smaller than the maximum AUMI drawdown of -39.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOD and AUMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLOD	AUMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.36%	-39.84%	+8.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.36%	-39.84%	+8.48%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.11%	-37.13%	+27.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.87%	-8.76%	+0.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.28%	18.58%	-3.30%

Volatility

CLOD vs. AUMI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Themes Cloud Computing ETF (CLOD) is 6.11%, while Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI) has a volatility of 12.73%. This indicates that CLOD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AUMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CLOD	AUMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.11%	12.73%	-6.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.32%	40.50%	-18.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.45%	50.84%	-24.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.50%	42.44%	-17.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.50%	42.44%	-17.94%

CLOD vs. AUMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CLOD and AUMI have an expense ratio of 0.35%.

Dividends

CLOD vs. AUMI - Dividend Comparison

CLOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, more than AUMI's 1.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
AUMI Themes Gold Miners ETF	1.03%	0.86%	1.84%
CLOD Themes Cloud Computing ETF	1.47%	1.47%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLOD and AUMI in my portfolio?

CLOD and AUMI have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CLOD or AUMI?

AUMI has higher volatility (12.73%) compared to CLOD (6.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLOD dropped -31.36% vs AUMI's -39.84%.

Which ETF is better, CLOD or AUMI?

On 1-year performance, AUMI leads with 46.27% vs -2.27% for CLOD. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, CLOD has been the lower-risk option at 6.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CLOD or AUMI?

Over the 1-year period, AUMI has performed better with a 46.27% return vs -2.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CLOD or AUMI?

CLOD and AUMI have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CLOD or AUMI?

CLOD has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 1.03% for AUMI.

What is the main difference between CLOD and AUMI?

CLOD is categorized as Technology Equities, while AUMI is Gold. CLOD tracks Solactive Cloud Technology Index, while AUMI tracks Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AUMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.