CLOB vs. NLR

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

CLOB (VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF) and NLR (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CLOB is a CLO fund actively managed by VanEck, while NLR is a Uranium fund tracking the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. CLOB is actively managed, while NLR is passively managed. Over the past year, CLOB returned 6.21% vs 10.28% for NLR. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CLOB charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for NLR.

Performance

CLOB vs. NLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF (CLOB) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLOB achieves a 2.13% return, which is significantly higher than NLR's -3.82% return.

CLOB

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 0.37%
• YTD: 2.13%
• 6M: 2.08%
• 1Y: 6.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NLR

• 1D: -2.41%
• 1M: -8.71%
• YTD: -3.82%
• 6M: -7.14%
• 1Y: 10.28%
• 3Y*: 30.47%
• 5Y*: 20.31%
• 10Y*: 12.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLOB vs. NLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CLOB VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF	2.13%	6.94%	2.77%
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF	-3.82%	56.50%	-2.56%

Correlation

The correlation between CLOB and NLR is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2024	0.11

Return for Risk

CLOB vs. NLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLOB

CLOB Risk / Return Rank: 77
CLOB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
CLOB Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
CLOB Omega Ratio Rank: 85
CLOB Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
CLOB Martin Ratio Rank: 79

NLR

NLR Risk / Return Rank: 13
NLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
NLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
NLR Omega Ratio Rank: 13
NLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
NLR Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLOB vs. NLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF (CLOB) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CLOB	NLR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.12	0.24	+1.87
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.05	0.64	+2.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.07	+0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.19	0.35	+2.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.70	0.74	+12.96

CLOB vs. NLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLOB Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the NLR Sharpe Ratio of 0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLOB and NLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CLOB vs. NLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLOB drawdown since its inception was -5.54%, smaller than the maximum NLR drawdown of -65.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOB and NLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLOB	NLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.54%	-65.05%	+59.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.96%	-29.72%	+27.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-30.48%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-30.48%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.01%	-27.33%	+27.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.29%	-35.68%	+35.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.45%	13.94%	-13.49%

Volatility

CLOB vs. NLR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF (CLOB) is 0.46%, while VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) has a volatility of 13.71%. This indicates that CLOB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CLOB	NLR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.46%	13.71%	-13.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.44%	32.79%	-30.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.95%	42.87%	-39.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.44%	29.65%	-24.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.44%	24.27%	-18.83%

CLOB vs. NLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLOB has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than NLR's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

CLOB vs. NLR - Dividend Comparison

CLOB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.41%, more than NLR's 2.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CLOB VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF	6.41%	6.61%	1.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF	2.65%	2.55%	0.76%	4.54%	2.02%	1.99%	2.23%	2.21%	3.91%	4.86%	3.62%	3.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLOB and NLR in my portfolio?

CLOB and NLR have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CLOB or NLR?

NLR has higher volatility (13.71%) compared to CLOB (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLOB dropped -5.54% vs NLR's -65.05%.

Which ETF is better, CLOB or NLR?

On 1-year performance, NLR leads with 10.28% vs 6.21% for CLOB. On fees, CLOB is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, CLOB has been the lower-risk option at 0.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CLOB or NLR?

Over the 1-year period, NLR has performed better with a 10.28% return vs 6.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CLOB or NLR?

CLOB is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for NLR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CLOB or NLR?

CLOB has the higher dividend yield at 6.41%, compared with 2.65% for NLR.

What is the main difference between CLOB and NLR?

CLOB is categorized as CLO, while NLR is Uranium. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CLOB and 0.56% for NLR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CLOB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.