CLOB vs. GDXJ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CLOB (VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF) and GDXJ (VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CLOB is a CLO fund actively managed by VanEck, while GDXJ is a Gold fund tracking the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index. CLOB is actively managed, while GDXJ is passively managed. Over the past year, CLOB returned 6.36% vs 65.12% for GDXJ. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CLOB charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for GDXJ.

Performance

CLOB vs. GDXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF (CLOB) and VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLOB achieves a 1.88% return, which is significantly higher than GDXJ's -2.55% return.

CLOB

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.47%
• YTD: 1.88%
• 6M: 2.35%
• 1Y: 6.36%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GDXJ

• 1D: -4.40%
• 1M: -1.95%
• YTD: -2.55%
• 6M: 6.26%
• 1Y: 65.12%
• 3Y*: 46.12%
• 5Y*: 17.46%
• 10Y*: 13.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLOB vs. GDXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CLOB VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF	1.88%	6.94%	2.81%
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF	-2.55%	172.28%	-13.22%

Correlation

The correlation between CLOB and GDXJ is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2024	0.10

Return for Risk

CLOB vs. GDXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLOB

CLOB Risk / Return Rank: 68
CLOB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
CLOB Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
CLOB Omega Ratio Rank: 75
CLOB Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
CLOB Martin Ratio Rank: 74

GDXJ

GDXJ Risk / Return Rank: 35
GDXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
GDXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
GDXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 35
GDXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
GDXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLOB vs. GDXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF (CLOB) and VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CLOB	GDXJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.15	1.32	+0.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.09	1.74	+1.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.24	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.27	1.99	+1.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.04	4.95	+9.09
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CLOB vs. GDXJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLOB Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is higher than the GDXJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLOB and GDXJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CLOB	GDXJ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.15	1.32	+0.83
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.43	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.30	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.27	0.06	+1.21

Drawdowns

CLOB vs. GDXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLOB drawdown since its inception was -5.54%, smaller than the maximum GDXJ drawdown of -88.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOB and GDXJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLOB	GDXJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.54%	-88.66%	+83.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.96%	-32.92%	+30.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-32.92%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-50.99%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-57.77%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.13%	-29.01%	+28.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.30%	-60.50%	+60.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.45%	13.19%	-12.74%

Volatility

CLOB vs. GDXJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF (CLOB) is 0.97%, while VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) has a volatility of 16.66%. This indicates that CLOB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CLOB	GDXJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.97%	16.66%	-15.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.46%	41.34%	-38.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.98%	49.79%	-46.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.53%	41.10%	-35.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.53%	44.06%	-38.53%

CLOB vs. GDXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLOB has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than GDXJ's 0.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

CLOB vs. GDXJ - Dividend Comparison

CLOB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.42%, more than GDXJ's 2.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CLOB VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF	6.42%	6.61%	1.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF	2.39%	2.33%	2.61%	0.72%	0.51%	1.78%	1.58%	0.39%	0.45%	0.03%	4.78%	0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLOB and GDXJ in my portfolio?

CLOB and GDXJ have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CLOB or GDXJ?

GDXJ has higher volatility (16.66%) compared to CLOB (0.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLOB dropped -5.54% vs GDXJ's -88.66%.

Which ETF is better, CLOB or GDXJ?

On 1-year performance, GDXJ leads with 65.12% vs 6.36% for CLOB. On fees, CLOB is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, CLOB has been the lower-risk option at 0.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CLOB or GDXJ?

Over the 1-year period, GDXJ has performed better with a 65.12% return vs 6.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CLOB or GDXJ?

CLOB is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for GDXJ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CLOB or GDXJ?

CLOB has the higher dividend yield at 6.42%, compared with 2.39% for GDXJ.

What is the main difference between CLOB and GDXJ?

CLOB is categorized as CLO, while GDXJ is Gold. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CLOB and 0.52% for GDXJ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CLOB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.