CLMB vs. FDVV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CLMB (Climb Global Solutions) is a stock, while FDVV (Fidelity High Dividend ETF) is Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Core Dividend Index. Over the past 5 years, CLMB returned 26.26%/yr vs 13.36%/yr for FDVV. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CLMB vs. FDVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLMB achieves a -14.82% return, which is significantly lower than FDVV's 8.39% return.

CLMB

• 1D: -2.67%
• 1M: 16.72%
• YTD: -14.82%
• 6M: -17.64%
• 1Y: -18.01%
• 3Y*: 23.09%
• 5Y*: 26.26%
• 10Y*: 20.48%

FDVV

• 1D: -1.12%
• 1M: 4.44%
• YTD: 8.39%
• 6M: 8.67%
• 1Y: 23.45%
• 3Y*: 20.08%
• 5Y*: 13.36%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLMB vs. FDVV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CLMB Climb Global Solutions	-14.82%	-18.40%	133.60%	76.59%	-8.29%	88.47%	22.14%	70.90%	-37.08%	-7.01%
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF	8.39%	17.08%	21.81%	18.00%	-4.21%	29.24%	2.80%	24.07%	-1.26%	14.00%

Correlation

The correlation between CLMB and FDVV is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.35
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016	0.23

The correlation between CLMB and FDVV shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (all time) to 0.35 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CLMB vs. FDVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLMB

CLMB Risk / Return Rank: 27
CLMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
CLMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
CLMB Omega Ratio Rank: 26
CLMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
CLMB Martin Ratio Rank: 27

FDVV

FDVV Risk / Return Rank: 64
FDVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
FDVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
FDVV Omega Ratio Rank: 71
FDVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
FDVV Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLMB vs. FDVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CLMB	FDVV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.35	2.35	-2.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.16	3.28	-3.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.43	-0.46
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.34	2.53	-2.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.71	10.54	-11.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CLMB vs. FDVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLMB Sharpe Ratio is -0.35, which is lower than the FDVV Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLMB and FDVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CLMB	FDVV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.35	2.35	-2.70
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58	0.91	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.21	0.79	-0.58

Drawdowns

CLMB vs. FDVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLMB drawdown since its inception was -89.12%, which is greater than FDVV's maximum drawdown of -40.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLMB and FDVV.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLMB	FDVV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.12%	-40.25%	-48.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-53.40%	-9.30%	-44.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-53.40%	-15.90%	-37.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.40%	-20.18%	-33.22%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-53.40%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-38.85%	-1.12%	-37.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.23%	-3.81%	-28.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	25.54%	2.23%	+23.31%

Volatility

CLMB vs. FDVV - Volatility Comparison

Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) has a higher volatility of 10.26% compared to Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) at 3.14%. This indicates that CLMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CLMB	FDVV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.26%	3.14%	+7.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.44%	7.99%	+32.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	51.85%	10.06%	+41.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	45.73%	14.75%	+30.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.85%	17.00%	+23.85%

Dividends

CLMB vs. FDVV - Dividend Comparison

CLMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than FDVV's 2.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CLMB Climb Global Solutions	0.39%	0.66%	0.67%	1.24%	2.16%	1.94%	3.56%	4.20%	6.80%	4.07%	3.64%	3.71%
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF	2.72%	2.89%	2.94%	3.77%	3.44%	2.70%	3.19%	3.93%	4.05%	3.66%	1.04%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLMB and FDVV in my portfolio?

CLMB and FDVV have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CLMB or FDVV?

CLMB has higher volatility (10.26%) compared to FDVV (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLMB dropped -89.12% vs FDVV's -40.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.