CLG.TO vs. XQB.TO
CLG.TO (iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF) and XQB.TO (iShares High Quality Canadian Bond Index ETF) are both Canadian Government Bonds funds from iShares tracking the Morningstar Can Core Bd GR CAD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CLG.TO returned 1.54%/yr vs 1.67%/yr for XQB.TO. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CLG.TO charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for XQB.TO.
Performance
CLG.TO vs. XQB.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLG.TO achieves a 1.12% return, which is significantly lower than XQB.TO's 1.43% return. Over the past 10 years, CLG.TO has underperformed XQB.TO with an annualized return of 1.54%, while XQB.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 1.67% annualized return.
CLG.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.03%
- YTD
- 1.12%
- 6M
- 0.70%
- 1Y
- 2.75%
- 3Y*
- 4.14%
- 5Y*
- 1.34%
- 10Y*
- 1.54%
XQB.TO
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 1.52%
- YTD
- 1.43%
- 6M
- 1.14%
- 1Y
- 2.76%
- 3Y*
- 4.39%
- 5Y*
- 0.95%
- 10Y*
- 1.67%
CLG.TO vs. XQB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLG.TO iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF | 1.12% | 3.35% | 4.30% | 4.82% | -6.21% | -2.23% | 6.66% | 3.40% | 1.69% | -0.02% |
XQB.TO iShares High Quality Canadian Bond Index ETF | 1.43% | 3.16% | 4.17% | 6.51% | -10.61% | -2.84% | 8.32% | 6.05% | 1.38% | 1.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLG.TO and XQB.TO is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2011 | 0.72 |
The correlation between CLG.TO and XQB.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (all time) to 0.89 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLG.TO vs. XQB.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CLG.TO
XQB.TO
CLG.TO vs. XQB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF (CLG.TO) and iShares High Quality Canadian Bond Index ETF (XQB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CLG.TO | XQB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.12 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.43 | 1.03 | +0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.56 | 2.55 | +1.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CLG.TO | XQB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 | 0.68 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.16 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.29 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.53 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
CLG.TO vs. XQB.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLG.TO drawdown since its inception was -10.74%, smaller than the maximum XQB.TO drawdown of -16.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLG.TO and XQB.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLG.TO | XQB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.74% | -16.57% | +5.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.93% | -2.70% | +0.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.38% | -4.25% | +0.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.96% | -14.59% | +4.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -10.74% | -16.57% | +5.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.56% | -0.55% | -0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.00% | -3.07% | +1.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.77% | 1.09% | -0.32% |
Volatility
CLG.TO vs. XQB.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF (CLG.TO) is 1.13%, while iShares High Quality Canadian Bond Index ETF (XQB.TO) has a volatility of 1.55%. This indicates that CLG.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XQB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLG.TO | XQB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.13% | 1.55% | -0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.34% | 3.31% | -0.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.00% | 4.10% | -1.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.31% | 5.89% | -1.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.34% | 5.78% | -1.44% |
CLG.TO vs. XQB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLG.TO has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than XQB.TO's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CLG.TO vs. XQB.TO - Dividend Comparison
CLG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, less than XQB.TO's 3.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLG.TO iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF | 2.54% | 2.54% | 2.53% | 2.51% | 2.55% | 2.61% | 2.59% | 2.88% | 3.02% | 3.17% | 3.25% | 3.34% |
XQB.TO iShares High Quality Canadian Bond Index ETF | 3.42% | 3.39% | 3.24% | 2.93% | 2.75% | 2.37% | 2.37% | 2.53% | 2.59% | 2.54% | 2.67% | 2.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLG.TO and XQB.TO have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XQB.TO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XQB.TO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for CLG.TO.
Both ETFs track Morningstar Can Core Bd GR CAD. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for CLG.TO and 0.13% for XQB.TO.
Find the right allocation for CLG.TO and XQB.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer