CLG.TO vs. ASA
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF (CLG.TO) and ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA).
CLG.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Can Core Bd GR CAD. It was launched on Oct 20, 2011.
Performance
CLG.TO vs. ASA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CLG.TO vs. ASA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLG.TO iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF | 0.35% | 3.35% | 4.30% | 4.82% | -6.21% | -2.23% | 6.66% | 3.40% | 1.69% | -0.02% |
ASA ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited | 5.36% | 182.04% | 46.11% | 3.06% | -27.22% | -4.36% | 57.93% | 37.26% | -9.07% | -3.66% |
Different Trading Currencies
CLG.TO is traded in CAD, while ASA is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ASA values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLG.TO achieves a 0.35% return, which is significantly lower than ASA's 5.36% return. Over the past 10 years, CLG.TO has underperformed ASA with an annualized return of 1.53%, while ASA has yielded a comparatively higher 20.72% annualized return.
CLG.TO
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -1.32%
- YTD
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 0.29%
- 1Y
- 1.64%
- 3Y*
- 3.40%
- 5Y*
- 1.30%
- 10Y*
- 1.53%
ASA
- 1D
- 7.25%
- 1M
- -22.19%
- YTD
- 5.36%
- 6M
- 35.40%
- 1Y
- 99.28%
- 3Y*
- 58.77%
- 5Y*
- 27.58%
- 10Y*
- 20.72%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLG.TO vs. ASA — Risk / Return Rank
CLG.TO
ASA
CLG.TO vs. ASA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF (CLG.TO) and ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CLG.TO | ASA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.54 | 2.13 | -1.59 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.73 | 2.41 | -1.68 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.33 | -0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.94 | 3.14 | -2.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.26 | 11.34 | -9.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CLG.TO | ASA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 | 2.13 | -1.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.87 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.62 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.30 | +0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between CLG.TO and ASA is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CLG.TO vs. ASA - Dividend Comparison
CLG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, more than ASA's 0.10% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLG.TO iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF | 2.55% | 2.54% | 2.53% | 2.51% | 2.55% | 2.61% | 2.59% | 2.88% | 3.02% | 3.17% | 3.25% | 3.34% |
ASA ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited | 0.10% | 0.10% | 0.20% | 0.13% | 0.14% | 0.09% | 0.09% | 0.15% | 0.32% | 0.35% | 0.36% | 0.56% |
Drawdowns
CLG.TO vs. ASA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLG.TO drawdown since its inception was -10.74%, smaller than the maximum ASA drawdown of -73.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLG.TO and ASA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLG.TO | ASA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.74% | -80.36% | +69.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.93% | -32.51% | +30.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.96% | -51.33% | +41.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -10.74% | -51.66% | +40.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.32% | -23.69% | +22.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.01% | -42.62% | +40.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.80% | 9.00% | -8.20% |
Volatility
CLG.TO vs. ASA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF (CLG.TO) is 1.31%, while ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA) has a volatility of 20.91%. This indicates that CLG.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CLG.TO | ASA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.31% | 20.91% | -19.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.03% | 39.46% | -37.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.06% | 46.92% | -43.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.27% | 32.04% | -27.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.32% | 33.64% | -29.32% |